3.1.1

What is the Right Thing To Do?

Test yourself on What is the Right Thing To Do?

Test your knowledge with free interactive questions on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

What is the Right Thing To Do?

How do we decide how to behave? When faced with matters of life and death, what is the right thing to do? It is not always obvious. We can see this by looking at a problem often used in teaching philosophy.

The Trolley Problem

The Trolley Problem

  • An out of control trolley is hurtling down a railway track and heading for five people tied to the track.
    • It will kill them all. But you are next to a lever that can divert the trolley.
    • The problem is that there is one person on the diverted track and you can’t warn them.
  • What should you do? Let events take their course, resulting in five deaths. Or, deliberately choose to kill one person instead?
R v Dudley and Stevens

R v Dudley and Stevens

  • We can also look at an actual case from the 19th Century.
    • Adrift in a lifeboat, and at risk of dying of thirst, a group of sailors decided to kill one of their group. So they could drink his blood and survive.
    • Was this the right thing to do, to kill one person?
R v Dudley and Stevens (cont.)

R v Dudley and Stevens (cont.)

  • This became a famous legal case. Because the remaining men did survive and two of them were tried and found guilty of murder.
    • Later, though, they were released after a short prison sentence. Because others decided that a verdict of murder was unjust in the circumstances.
Morality in The Trolley Problem

Morality in The Trolley Problem

  • These two scenarios point out just how hard it can be to decide what is right and just.
  • In the first example of the trolley, is the person near the lever to blame for whatever happens?
    • Perhaps it was best for that person to keep out of it.
    • Is it simply a matter of numbers?
    • Is there a difference between letting people die and deliberately killing someone?
Morality in Dudley and Stevens

Morality in Dudley and Stevens

  • In the case against Dudley and Stevens we see both murder and cannibalism.
    • Most societies would say these are morally wrong.
    • But could they have been the right thing to do in the circumstances?
  • In this second case, the law saw some justification in what they did.
    • Does the law have to think about the best outcome?
    • In applying the law, do we not have to ask what would we have done?
Jump to other topics
1

Year 7

1.1

Origins of Abrahamic Faith

1.2

Judaism

1.3

Christianity

1.4

Disciplinary Knowledge

2

Year 8

2.1

Islam

2.2

Hindu Dharma (Hinduism)

2.3

Buddhism

2.4

Sikhi

2.5

Atheism

2.6

Philosophy of Religion

2.7

Disciplinary Knowledge

3

Year 9

3.1

Life & Death

3.2

Extremism

3.3

Equality

4

Additional Concepts

Practice questions on What is the Right Thing To Do?

Can you answer these? Test yourself with free interactive practice on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Answer all questions on What is the Right Thing To Do?

Unlock your full potential with Seneca Premium

  • Unlimited access to 10,000+ open-ended exam questions

  • Mini-mock exams based on your study history

  • Unlock 800+ premium courses & e-books

Get started with Seneca Premium