9.1.8

Matching Hypothesis Studies

Test yourself

Walster et al (1966) — Computer Dance Study

Walster et al (1966) aimed to test a theory first suggested by Erving Goffman called the "matching hypothesis”.

Illustrative background for Research methodIllustrative background for Research method ?? "content

Research method

  • Walster et al (1966) randomly paired 752 1st year Minnesota students into “blind-date” couples for a university dance.
  • Each of the 752 students in Walster’s study completed questionnaires measuring their various qualities e.g. social skills, intelligence and so on.
  • Their physical attractiveness was assessed on entry to the dance. The prediction of the researchers was that participants would like their randomly allocated partners more if they were well matched according to their questionnaires.
Illustrative background for Results/conclusions Illustrative background for Results/conclusions  ?? "content

Results/conclusions

  • To the surprise of the researchers, the matching hypothesis was not supported.
  • The only factor that the participants were interested in was physical attractiveness.
Illustrative background for Evaluation of **Walster et al (1966)**Illustrative background for Evaluation of **Walster et al (1966)** ?? "content

Evaluation of Walster et al (1966)

  • Strengths
    • Easy to replicate.
    • Standardised study.
  • Limitations
  • Temporal validity – in the 1960s, stereotypical gender roles were very different. Women would have been less likely to ask men out.
    • Ethics.
    • Participants had already been on a date, so did not need to fear rejection.

Murstein (1972) – Matching Hypothesis

Murstein (1972) investigated whether or not married couples choose a partner with a similar level of attractiveness to themselves.

Illustrative background for Research methodIllustrative background for Research method ?? "content

Research method

  • Naïve participants were asked to rate individual photographs of married couples for attractiveness.
Illustrative background for Results & conclusion Illustrative background for Results & conclusion  ?? "content

Results & conclusion

  • Results
    • A positive correlation of attractiveness ratings was discovered between the photographs of the married men and women.
  • Conclusion
    • This provides evidence to support the matching hypothesis theory - that people choose a partner with a similar level of attractiveness to themselves.
Illustrative background for Evaluation of **Murstein (1972)**Illustrative background for Evaluation of **Murstein (1972)** ?? "content

Evaluation of Murstein (1972)

  • Strengths
    • Easy to replicate.
    • Ethical.
  • Limitations
    • Validity of ratings.
    • Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
    • Did not look at homosexual couples or cultural variations.

Jump to other topics

1Social Influence

2Memory

3Attachment

4Psychopathology

5Approaches in Psychology

6Biopsychology

7Research Methods

8Issues & Debates in Psychology (A2 only)

9Option 1: Relationships (A2 only)

10Option 1: Gender (A2 only)

11Option 1: Cognition & Development (A2 only)

12Option 2: Schizophrenia (A2 only)

13Option 2: Eating Behaviour (A2 only)

14Option 2: Stress (A2 only)

15Option 3: Aggression (A2 only)

16Option 3: Forensic Psychology (A2 only)

17Option 3: Addiction (A2 only)

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson