15.2.7

Deindividuation

Test yourself

Deindividuation

Deindividuation is part of the social psychological theory of aggression. It is a psychological state in which individuals lose their personal identity and take on the identity of the social group.

Illustrative background for __Gustave Le Bon (1895)__Illustrative background for __Gustave Le Bon (1895)__ ?? "content

Gustave Le Bon (1895)

  • Deindividuation was originally conceived by Gustave Le Bon (1895) to explain the behaviour of the individual in crowds.
  • It can also occur when people are wearing a uniform.
  • It can result in individuals feeling free from the constraints of social norms.
  • Under normal circumstances our behaviour is restrained by social norms, and we live in a society where most forms of aggressive behaviour are discouraged.
Illustrative background for Crowd mentality Illustrative background for Crowd mentality  ?? "content

Crowd mentality

  • But when we become part of a crowd, we lose restraint and have the freedom to behave in ways we wouldn’t otherwise contemplate.
  • We lose our sense of both individual self-identity and responsibility for our behaviour, and we have a greater disregard for norms and even laws.
  • Responsibility becomes shared throughout the crowd, so we experience less personal guilt at harmful aggression directed at others.
Illustrative background for Individuated and deindividuated behaviourIllustrative background for Individuated and deindividuated behaviour ?? "content

Individuated and deindividuated behaviour

  • Zimbardo distinguished between individuated and deindividuated behaviour.
    • In an individuated state, our behaviour is generally rational and normative.
    • Deindividuated behaviours are emotional, impulsive and irrational. Most importantly, they are anti-normative and disinhibited.
Illustrative background for Deindividuated behaviourIllustrative background for Deindividuated behaviour ?? "content

Deindividuated behaviour

  • When we are in deindividuated state:
    • We lose our self-awareness.
    • We stop monitoring and regulating our own behaviour.
    • We ignore social norms and live for the moment, failing to form longer term plans.
  • The conditions of deindividuation which promote aggressive behaviour include:
    • Darkness, drugs, alcohol, uniforms, masks and disguises.

Anonymity and Self-Awareness

A major factor of deindividuation is anonymity. Prentice-Dunn and Rogers (1982) suggest that aggression as a consequence of anonymity is due to two types of self-awareness.

Illustrative background for __Dixon and Mahendran (2012)__Illustrative background for __Dixon and Mahendran (2012)__ ?? "content

Dixon and Mahendran (2012)

  • According to Dixon and Mahendran (2012), it is anonymity that shapes crowd behaviour.
  • Anonymity means that we have less fear of retribution because we’re small and unidentifiable within a faceless crowd.
    • The bigger the crowd, the more anonymous we are.
  • Anonymity also provides fewer opportunities for others to judge us negatively.
Illustrative background for __Prentice-Dunn and Rogers (1982)__Illustrative background for __Prentice-Dunn and Rogers (1982)__ ?? "content

Prentice-Dunn and Rogers (1982)

  • The experience of deindividuation as part of a faceless crowd creates a greater likelihood of aggression.
  • Prentice-Dunn and Rogers (1982), suggest that this is not due to anonymity directly but to the consequences of anonymity.
  • They explained this process in terms of two types of self-awareness.
Illustrative background for Private self-awarenessIllustrative background for Private self-awareness ?? "content

Private self-awareness

  • Private self-awareness concerns how we pay attention to our own feelings and behaviour.
  • This is reduced when we are part of the crowd.
  • Our attention becomes focused outwardly to the events around us, so we pay less attention to our own beliefs and feelings.
  • We are less self-critical, less thoughtful and less evaluative, all of which foster a deindividuated state.
Illustrative background for Public self-awarenessIllustrative background for Public self-awareness ?? "content

Public self-awareness

  • Public self-awareness refers to how much we care about what other people think about our behaviour.
  • This is also reduced in crowds.
  • We realise that we are just one individual amongst many; we are anonymous and our behaviour is less likely to be judged by others.
  • We no longer care how others see us, so we become less accountable for our aggression and destructive actions.

Aggression and Anonymity

Dodd (1985) was a psychology teacher who developed a classroom exercise to illustrate deindividuation. Douglas and McGarty (2001) looked at aggressive online behaviour in chat rooms.

Illustrative background for Question Illustrative background for Question  ?? "content

Question

  • Dodd (1985) asked 229 undergraduate psychology students in 13 classes this question:
    • ‘If you could do anything humanly possible with complete assurance that you would not be detected or held responsible, what would you do?’
Illustrative background for MethodIllustrative background for Method ?? "content

Method

  • The students were aware that their responses were completely anonymous.
  • Three independent directors who did not know the hypothesis decided which categories of antisocial behaviour the responses belong to.
Illustrative background for FindingsIllustrative background for Findings ?? "content

Findings

  • Dodd found that:
    • 36% of the responses involved some form of antisocial behaviour.
    • 26% were actual crimes.
      • The most common of which was rob a bank.
      • A few students opted for murder, rape and an assassination of a political figure.
    • Only 9% of responses were prosocial behaviours, such as helping people.
Illustrative background for Conclusions Illustrative background for Conclusions  ?? "content

Conclusions

  • In terms of how people imagine they would behave, this study demonstrates a link between anonymity, deindividuation and aggressive behaviour.
Illustrative background for __Douglas and McGarty (2001)__ Illustrative background for __Douglas and McGarty (2001)__  ?? "content

Douglas and McGarty (2001)

  • Douglas and McGarty (2001) looked at aggressive online behaviour in chat rooms and uses of instant messages.
  • They found a strong correlation between anonymity and ‘flaming’, (sending or posting threatening and/or hostile messages.)
  • The most aggressive messages were sent by those who chose to hide their real identities.
Illustrative background for ConclusionsIllustrative background for Conclusions ?? "content

Conclusions

  • This suggests the existence of the link between anonymity, deindividuation and aggressive behaviour in a context that has even greater relevance today because of the increase in social media use, and the activities of online trolls.

Jump to other topics

1Social Influence

2Memory

3Attachment

4Psychopathology

5Approaches in Psychology

6Biopsychology

7Research Methods

8Issues & Debates in Psychology (A2 only)

9Option 1: Relationships (A2 only)

10Option 1: Gender (A2 only)

11Option 1: Cognition & Development (A2 only)

12Option 2: Schizophrenia (A2 only)

13Option 2: Eating Behaviour (A2 only)

14Option 2: Stress (A2 only)

15Option 3: Aggression (A2 only)

16Option 3: Forensic Psychology (A2 only)

17Option 3: Addiction (A2 only)

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson