17.1.4

Evaluation of a Learning Theory Explanation

Test yourself

Evaluation of Learning Theory: Strengths

The learning theory states that smoking is a learned behaviour by observing and modelling smoking behaviour. Smoking behaviour is then reinforced through operant or classical conditioning.

Illustrative background for __Moolchan et al. (2000)__Illustrative background for __Moolchan et al. (2000)__ ?? "content

Moolchan et al. (2000)

  • There have been a number of studies that support the theory. - One such study was done by Moolchan et al. (2000).
    • They discovered that 75% of teenage smokers had at least one parent that smoked.
  • In other words, they were likely to learn smoking behaviour from their parents, which supports social learning theory.
Illustrative background for __Moolchan et al. (2000)__ cont.Illustrative background for __Moolchan et al. (2000)__ cont. ?? "content

Moolchan et al. (2000) cont.

  • Additionally, the teens surveyed said that they liked to smoke to fit in with their peers.
  • So the idea of operant conditioning is supported - the teens continued to smoke because the habit was positively reinforced.
Illustrative background for Cue reactivityIllustrative background for Cue reactivity ?? "content

Cue reactivity

  • A second study conducted by Engelmann et al. (2012) provided support for cue reactivity.
  • Cue reactivity is a form of classical conditioning whereby people see stimuli associated with smoking (such as alcohol, cigarette lighters, people who smoke) and begin to crave nicotine as a result.
Illustrative background for  __Engelmann et al.__Illustrative background for  __Engelmann et al.__ ?? "content

Engelmann et al.

  • Engelmann et al. completed a meta-analysis of fMRI examinations.
  • They found, in smokers, that there were larger neural responses to smoking-related cues compared to non-smoking (neutral) cues.
Illustrative background for Generalisability Illustrative background for Generalisability  ?? "content

Generalisability

  • A third strength is the fact that many of the studies were conducted with humans, rather than with animals.
  • So the conclusions drawn from these studies can be generalised to the population.
  • The brain neurochemistry approach did many animal studies, so the findings from these studies could not be generalised to humans.
Illustrative background for Psychological and physical dependenceIllustrative background for Psychological and physical dependence ?? "content

Psychological and physical dependence

  • Finally, some substances, such as cannabis, do not cause physical withdrawal symptoms.
  • So addictions to these substances cannot be explained through the brain neurochemistry approach.
  • But the learning theory explains the psychological dependence formed for these substances.
  • This is a strength of the learning theory because it explains both psychological dependence and physical dependence.

Evaluation of Learning Theory: Weaknesses

The learning theory states that smoking is a learned behaviour by observing and modelling smoking behaviour. Smoking behaviour is then reinforced through operant or classical conditioning.

Illustrative background for Nomothetic Illustrative background for Nomothetic  ?? "content

Nomothetic

  • Nomothetic approaches are those that focus on explaining behaviour through general laws that apply to whole populations.
  • The learning theory of explaining smoking behaviour is nomothetic, so does not take into account individual differences.
Illustrative background for Reductionist Illustrative background for Reductionist  ?? "content

Reductionist

  • The theory also ignores other factors that lead to addiction, such as genetics and the brain neurochemistry approach.
  • This makes it reductionist.
Illustrative background for Free will Illustrative background for Free will  ?? "content

Free will

  • Free will is the concept that people choose how to behave.
  • This is the opposite of determinism, where behaviour is a result of cause-and-effect relationships.
  • There is a certain degree of free will whereby people can make a decision to start smoking.
Illustrative background for Free will cont. Illustrative background for Free will cont.  ?? "content

Free will cont.

  • They can make this decision based on what they know about cigarettes (i.e. the dangers).
  • But the learning theory does not take into account free will, so is a weakness.
Illustrative background for Combination Illustrative background for Combination  ?? "content

Combination

  • Overall, addiction to cigarettes is likely to be a combination of brain neurochemistry (biochemical), genetics and social learning.
  • Biochemical and genetic factors fall on the nature side of the debate, while social learning falls on the nurture side of the debate.
Illustrative background for Nature and nurtureIllustrative background for Nature and nurture ?? "content

Nature and nurture

  • People may have genetics (nature) that make them more likely to be predisposed to addiction. But they may also have role models (environment/nurture) from which to imitate behaviour.
  • The majority of psychologists believe that most human behaviour, including addiction, is likely caused by the interaction of nature and nurture.

Jump to other topics

1Social Influence

2Memory

3Attachment

4Psychopathology

5Approaches in Psychology

6Biopsychology

7Research Methods

8Issues & Debates in Psychology (A2 only)

9Option 1: Relationships (A2 only)

10Option 1: Gender (A2 only)

11Option 1: Cognition & Development (A2 only)

12Option 2: Schizophrenia (A2 only)

13Option 2: Eating Behaviour (A2 only)

14Option 2: Stress (A2 only)

15Option 3: Aggression (A2 only)

16Option 3: Forensic Psychology (A2 only)

17Option 3: Addiction (A2 only)

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson