3.1.10

Disruption of Attachment

Test yourself

Bowlby's Maternal Deprivation Hypothesis

Bowlby's theory states that disruption to the attachment bond can cause damage to the child’s development and that there are three types: short-term separation, long-term deprivation and privation.

Illustrative background for Disruption effectIllustrative background for Disruption effect ?? "content

Disruption effect

  • Short-term separation is brief and temporary, eg. day care or short periods of hospitalisation.
  • According to Bowlby, in these circumstances children will display a relatively clear set of behaviours from protest, such as crying, lashing out, screaming and clinging, to despair, where the protest behaviour subsides and the infant becomes calmer and apathetic.
  • They internalise their anger and respond little to offers of comfort. They opt to comfort themselves by, for example, sucking their thumb.
Illustrative background for PDD modelIllustrative background for PDD model ?? "content

PDD model

  • The last stage is detachment, where the infant resumes their responses to other people but treats them warily. They might reject the caregiver on return and continue to display signs of anger.
  • Generally referred to as the PDD model (Protest, Despair, Detachment), Barrett (1997) has emphasised the role of individual differences. Barrett argues that infants who are securely attached and more mature may well cope better with separation.
Illustrative background for <b>Robertson and Robertson (1971)</b>Illustrative background for <b>Robertson and Robertson (1971)</b> ?? "content

Robertson and Robertson (1971)

  • They performed a study investigating maternal separation.
  • A child who had a close and stable relationship with his mother experienced severe distress when he spent nine days in a residential nursery following his mother’s hospitalisation.
  • On his mother’s return, John appeared confused and tried to get away from her. These negative effects were evident years later.
  • John appeared to have gone through the stages of the PDD model and suffered serious, irreversible damage. This supported Bowlby’s theory.
Illustrative background for EvaluationIllustrative background for Evaluation ?? "content

Evaluation

  • Robertson and Robertson (1971) took children facing short-term separations into their own home, providing them with an alternative attachment as well as routine.
  • They found that, by doing this, they prevented any severe psychological damage, supporting the maternal deprivation hypothesis.
  • Barrett (1997) argued that individual differences in reactions to short-term separation are very important.
Illustrative background for Limitations of the modelIllustrative background for Limitations of the model ?? "content

Limitations of the model

  • The sample is biased. Bowlby chose it himself and the majority of juvenile thieves are not referred to Children’s clinics.
  • The evidence is retrospective and therefore relies on accurate recall of past events.
  • Bowlby diagnosed affectionless psychopathology himself, a further example of bias.
Illustrative background for Limitations of the model 2Illustrative background for Limitations of the model 2 ?? "content

Limitations of the model 2

  • There is a correlation between early separation and later problems. Correlations cannot show cause. We need to consider other factors such as family problems, poverty etc.
  • Rutter – Bowlby fails to distinguish between deprivation (attachment broken) and privation (never forming an attachment)
  • Rutter – Need to consider other factors such as reasons for separation, how it was handled, age, gender, quality of care etc.

Long-Term Deprivation

Long-term deprivation happens when children are separated from those who they've formed an attachment with. Long-term deprivation can cause negative emotional effects.

Illustrative background for Long-term deprivationIllustrative background for Long-term deprivation ?? "content

Long-term deprivation

  • Long-term deprivation refers to a lengthy or permanent separation from an attachment figure.
  • Long-term deprivation can happen through divorce or separation or other factors, such as death or imprisonment.
Illustrative background for ImplicationIllustrative background for Implication ?? "content

Implication

  • Rogers and Pryor (1998) found that children who experience more than two divorces have the lowest adjustment rates and the most behavioural problems.
  • Furstenberg and Kiernan (2001) discovered that children who have experienced divorce suffer not only emotionally, but also in terms of emotional wellbeing, academic attainment and physical health.
  • These findings all support the maternal deprivation hypothesis.
Illustrative background for Contrasting research Illustrative background for Contrasting research  ?? "content

Contrasting research

  • Hetherington and Stanley-Hagen (1999) found that few children suffer long-term adjustment problems and that most adapt to their change in circumstances. This doesn't support Schaffer’s findings.
  • Richards (1987) concluded that while attachment disruption through divorce is more likely to result in resentment and stress, death of an attachment figure is more likely to lead to depression.
Illustrative background for EvaluationIllustrative background for Evaluation ?? "content

Evaluation

  • Research generally supports the hypothesis that long-term separation has a greater negative impact on development than short-term separation.
  • In some cases, divorce leads to a more positive environment and stronger bonds between children and parents, especially if the deterioration in the marriage has led to the creation of a hostile environment.
  • Research has led to the creation of strategies to help children cope with divorce. For example, some US states make divorcing parents attend an education programme.

Jump to other topics

1Social Influence

2Memory

3Attachment

4Psychopathology

5Approaches in Psychology

6Biopsychology

7Research Methods

8Issues & Debates in Psychology (A2 only)

9Option 1: Relationships (A2 only)

10Option 1: Gender (A2 only)

11Option 1: Cognition & Development (A2 only)

12Option 2: Schizophrenia (A2 only)

13Option 2: Eating Behaviour (A2 only)

14Option 2: Stress (A2 only)

15Option 3: Aggression (A2 only)

16Option 3: Forensic Psychology (A2 only)

17Option 3: Addiction (A2 only)

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson