10.1.11

Psychodynamic Approach to Gender Development 2

Test yourself

Little Hans Case Study and Gender Development

Freud had little scientific evidence to support his theory of gender development, however, he did use a case study to support his theory. By corresponding with the boy’s father, Freud used Hans' conversations, actions and dreams to develop his theory.

Illustrative background for Little HansIllustrative background for Little Hans ?? "content

Little Hans

  • Published in 1909, the Little Hans case study was fundamental not only to Freud’s gender development theory, but to his psychosexual theory as a whole.
  • Hans' father reported conversations he had had with his son to Freud via letters.
Illustrative background for WiddlerIllustrative background for Widdler ?? "content

Widdler

  • At the age of three, Little Hans (not his real name) had grown an interest in his own penis, which he named his ‘widdler’.
  • Hans asked his mother whether or not she had a penis.
  • His mother caught Hans touching himself when he was 3.5 years old.
  • She got angry at him, told him off, and threatened to castrate him (cut off his penis).
Illustrative background for Horse phobiaIllustrative background for Horse phobia ?? "content

Horse phobia

  • Hans developed a fear of horses.
  • Freud interpreted this fear as being displaced fear from his father.
  • Hans particularly had a fear of horses (white horses with blinkers and black mouths) that resembled his father (who had glasses and a moustache).
Illustrative background for Castration anxietyIllustrative background for Castration anxiety ?? "content

Castration anxiety

  • The fear of castration (castration anxiety) manifested itself into the Oedipus complex.
  • The Oedipus complex was a part of a broader description of psychosexual development.
  • As this was a case study based on only one individual, the theory has been heavily criticised.

Criticisms of Freud’s Psychosexual Gender Development

While foundational to the institution of modern psychology, Freud’s work has many detractions and critics. Criticisms include: lack of scientific testability, difficulty in generalising, difficulty in applying to a modern society and lack of insight into non-traditional families.

Illustrative background for Lack of scientific testabilityIllustrative background for Lack of scientific testability ?? "content

Lack of scientific testability

  • The first criticism is the fact that the study was a case study based on Freud’s own interpretations of Han’s actions.
  • Therefore, researchers and scientists are unable to scientifically test and verify his findings.
  • The study was subjective as Freud could develop interpretations that matched his own theories, rather than considering other perspectives as well.
Illustrative background for Lack of generalisability Illustrative background for Lack of generalisability  ?? "content

Lack of generalisability

  • The second criticism is the lack of generalisability to a whole population.
  • Freud argued that everyone goes through the Oedipus complex (Electra complex).
  • However, he based a lot of his ideas on those people with psychological problems.
  • Therefore, it may not be possible to generalise the ideas to the population.
Illustrative background for Effect of historical contextIllustrative background for Effect of historical context ?? "content

Effect of historical context

  • A third criticism is the difficulty in applying to a modern society.
  • Women in the early 1900s had very little power in relation to men, therefore, the concept of penis envy may have been more applicable.
  • However, with changing norms and a more equal society, this concept is outdated.
Illustrative background for Non-traditional familiesIllustrative background for Non-traditional families ?? "content

Non-traditional families

  • The final criticism is there is no consideration of non-traditional families.
  • Again, this is most likely because of the norms of the time.
  • The majority of families would have had a mother and a father in traditional gender roles.
  • However, in modern society, there are ‘non-traditional’ families, such as two parents of the same sex (homosexuals) or single parent homes.
Illustrative background for Evidence of limitationsIllustrative background for Evidence of limitations ?? "content

Evidence of limitations

  • A study that negates Freud’s conclusions was conducted by Kirkpatrick et al (1981).
  • They compared 20 children that came from households with heterosexual parents to 20 children that were raised in households with homosexual (lesbian) mothers.
  • The age ranges were from 5 to 12.
  • The study found that there were no apparent differences in gender development between the two groups.

Jump to other topics

1Social Influence

2Memory

3Attachment

4Psychopathology

5Approaches in Psychology

6Biopsychology

7Research Methods

8Issues & Debates in Psychology (A2 only)

9Option 1: Relationships (A2 only)

10Option 1: Gender (A2 only)

11Option 1: Cognition & Development (A2 only)

12Option 2: Schizophrenia (A2 only)

13Option 2: Eating Behaviour (A2 only)

14Option 2: Stress (A2 only)

15Option 3: Aggression (A2 only)

16Option 3: Forensic Psychology (A2 only)

17Option 3: Addiction (A2 only)

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson