2.1.17

Eyewitness Testimony - Age & Misleading Questions

Test yourself

Valentine and Coxon (1997) - Effect of Age on EWT

Research aim: To investigate the effect of age on eyewitness testimony and the effects of leading questions.

Illustrative background for ProcedureIllustrative background for Procedure ?? "content

Procedure

  • Laboratory experiment.
  • Three groups of participants:
    • Children (7-9 years);
    • Young adults (16-18);
    • Elderly (60-85).
  • Participants watched a video of a kidnapping and were then asked a series of leading and non-leading questions.
Illustrative background for Results & conclusionsIllustrative background for Results & conclusions ?? "content

Results & conclusions

  • Results:
    • Both the elderly and children gave more incorrect answers to non-leading questions. However, children were more likely to be misled by leading questions.
  • Conclusion:
    • This shows that children are more susceptible to the influence of leading questions and therefore do not make reliable eyewitnesses. The elderly and children are more likely to have poorer memories for events than young adults. This shows that age does influence the accuracy of eyewitness testimony.
Illustrative background for Evaluation Illustrative background for Evaluation  ?? "content

Evaluation

  • Strengths
    • Reliable – easy to replicate.
    • Practical implications for the use of children as witnesses.
  • Limitations
    • Lacks ecological validity – not real life.
    • Ethics – showing a crime video to young children.

Misleading Questions/Anxiety Not Affecting EWT

Yuille and Cutshall (1986) conducted a field study of a real-life crime, where a shop keeper had shot dead a thief. They aimed to investigate the effect of anxiety on memory recall.

Illustrative background for ProcedureIllustrative background for Procedure ?? "content

Procedure

  • There were 21 witnesses to the event and 13 agreed to take part in the study.
  • They were interviewed 4-5 months after the original interviews. The researchers compared their recollections to their original police interviews.
  • Witnesses were also asked to rate their level of stress at the time on a 7-point scale and if they had suffered any emotional issues since the event, such as insomnia.
Illustrative background for Results & conclusions Illustrative background for Results & conclusions  ?? "content

Results & conclusions

  • Results:
    • The levels of accuracy were high and, in fact, the more stressed group were more accurate (85%) than the less stressed group (75%).
  • Conclusion:
    • This showed that stress and anxiety can actually improve eyewitness testimony.
Illustrative background for Evaluation Illustrative background for Evaluation  ?? "content

Evaluation

  • Strengths
    • Real life – ecological validity.
    • Practical applications.
  • Limitations
    • Lack of control.
    • Participants could have collaborated with others or rehearsed their memories of the event.
    • Individual differences were not accounted for.
    • Not reliable, as cannot be replicated (unique event).

Jump to other topics

1Social Influence

2Memory

3Attachment

4Psychopathology

5Approaches in Psychology

6Biopsychology

7Research Methods

8Issues & Debates in Psychology (A2 only)

9Option 1: Relationships (A2 only)

10Option 1: Gender (A2 only)

11Option 1: Cognition & Development (A2 only)

12Option 2: Schizophrenia (A2 only)

13Option 2: Eating Behaviour (A2 only)

14Option 2: Stress (A2 only)

15Option 3: Aggression (A2 only)

16Option 3: Forensic Psychology (A2 only)

17Option 3: Addiction (A2 only)

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson