2.1.12

Studies on Interference

Test yourself

Study on Retroactive Interference

Underwood and Postman (1960) investigated how retroactive interference affects learning. In other words, does new learning affect your ability to recall previously learnt information?

Illustrative background for ProcedureIllustrative background for Procedure ?? "content

Procedure

  • A laboratory experiment with two groups of participants (control and experimental groups).
  • Both groups were given word pairs to learn e.g. dog-bread, chair-fork etc.
  • The experimental group was also given a second list to learn where the second word in the pair was changed e.g. dog-cake, chair-window etc. Both groups were then asked to recall the original list.
Illustrative background for Results and conclusionIllustrative background for Results and conclusion ?? "content

Results and conclusion

  • Result: The recall of the control group was much better than the experimental group.
  • Conclusion: The experimental group’s recall had been affected by retroactive interference.
Illustrative background for Evaluation Illustrative background for Evaluation  ?? "content

Evaluation

  • Strengths
    • Reliable – easy to replicate.
    • Practical applications for education, in particular revision.
  • Limitations
    • Lacks ecological validity – not how we use memory in everyday life.
    • The results could be explained by the limited capacity of STM rather than retroactive interference.
    • Interference only really explains forgetting when two pieces of information are really similar.

Study on Proactive Interference

Underwood (1957) investigated how proactive interference affects memory. In other words, do old memories affect your ability to recall new information?

Illustrative background for Procedure Illustrative background for Procedure  ?? "content

Procedure

  • A laboratory experiment.
  • Participants were given a list of nonsense syllables to remember and tested 24 hours later.
Illustrative background for ResultsIllustrative background for Results ?? "content

Results

  • Memory was much worse for these nonsense syllables than Underwood expected.
Illustrative background for Conclusion Illustrative background for Conclusion  ?? "content

Conclusion

  • Underwood concluded that the students’ experience of taking part in memory experiments in the past (even though none involved nonsense syllables) was causing confusion and led to proactive interference.
Illustrative background for Evaluation Illustrative background for Evaluation  ?? "content

Evaluation

  • Strengths
    • Reliable – easy to replicate
    • Practical application for education, in particular revision.
  • Limitations
    • Lacks ecological validity – not how we use memory in everyday life.
    • Interference only really explains forgetting when two pieces of information are really similar.

Jump to other topics

1Social Influence

2Memory

3Attachment

4Psychopathology

5Approaches in Psychology

6Biopsychology

7Research Methods

8Issues & Debates in Psychology (A2 only)

9Option 1: Relationships (A2 only)

10Option 1: Gender (A2 only)

11Option 1: Cognition & Development (A2 only)

12Option 2: Schizophrenia (A2 only)

13Option 2: Eating Behaviour (A2 only)

14Option 2: Stress (A2 only)

15Option 3: Aggression (A2 only)

16Option 3: Forensic Psychology (A2 only)

17Option 3: Addiction (A2 only)

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson