11.2.6

Evaluation of Kohlberg's Theory

Test yourself on Evaluation of Kohlberg's Theory

Test your knowledge with free interactive questions on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

Strengths of Kohlberg’s Theory of Gender Constancy

There are three studies that find evidence in support of the theory.

__Thompson (1975)__

Thompson (1975)

  • Thompson (1975) conducted a study on 2 and 3 year-olds.
  • They found that the 3-year-olds were much more likely to know their gender.
__Slaby and Frey (1975)__

Slaby and Frey (1975)

  • A study completed by Slaby and Frey (1975) on 2 to 5.5 year-olds found that the children did correspond to Kohlberg’s three stages.
  • They had developed gender identity, gender stability and gender constancy, in the correct order.
  • That is, for them to have reached a later stage, they also had reached the earlier stages, showing consistent results.
__Slaby and Frey (1975)__ cont.

Slaby and Frey (1975) cont.

  • Slaby and Frey (1975) studied gender constancy specifically.
  • They found that older children (those that were or had developed gender constancy) paid more attention to a person’s gender.
  • The children watched a video of a man and a woman.
  • The older children, compared to the younger children, paid more attention to the genders.
__Munroe et al. (1984)__

Munroe et al. (1984)

  • Finally, Munroe et al. (1984) studied 3 to 9-year olds from four different cultures:
    • Belize, Nepal, American Samoa, and Kenya.
  • They found that they also went through the three stages.
  • This proves that cognitive gender development is universal and the theory is generalisable to many cultures.

Weaknesses of Kohlberg’s Theory of Gender Constancy

Slaby and Frey (1975) also found several weaknesses in Kohlberg’s theory.

Age overestimate

Age overestimate

  • In their same study that found support for the theory, they also suggested that gender constancy happened earlier than age 7, even before the age of 6.
  • They suggested that Kohlberg’s ages were overestimated.
Boys v girls

Boys v girls

  • In addition, Slaby and Frey stated that boys were more likely to pay attention to gender differences than girls.
  • Kohlberg does not discuss this.
Social conditioning

Social conditioning

  • The theory does not take into account social influences and conditioning.
  • In other words, it does not look at the social or behavioural approach of gender.
Cause and effect

Cause and effect

  • The theory also does not explain why gender development follows these stages.
  • Perhaps the biological approach (differences in sex hormones) could aid in explaining.
Jump to other topics
1

Social Influence

2

Memory

3

Attachment

4

(2026 Exams) Psychopathology

5

(2027 Exams) Clinical Psychology & Mental Health

6

Approaches in Psychology

7

Biopsychology

8

Research Methods

8.1

Research Methods

8.2

Scientific Processes

8.3

Data Handling & Analysis

8.4

Inferential Testing

9

Issues & Debates in Psychology (A2 only)

10

Option 1: Relationships (A2 only)

10.1

Relationships: Sexual Relationships (A2 only)

10.2

Relationships: Romantic Relationships (A2 only)

10.3

(2026 Exams) Relationships: Virtual (A2 only)

10.4

(2027 Exams) Relationships: Online (A2 only)

11

Option 1: Gender (A2 only)

12

Option 1: Cognition & Development (A2 only)

13

Option 2: Schizophrenia (A2 only)

14

Option 2: Eating Behaviour (A2 only)

15

Option 2: Stress (A2 only)

16

Option 3: Aggression (A2 only)

17

Option 3: Forensic Psychology (A2 only)

18

Option 3: Addiction (A2 only)

Practice questions on Evaluation of Kohlberg's Theory

Can you answer these? Test yourself with free interactive practice on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Answer all questions on Evaluation of Kohlberg's Theory

Unlock your full potential with Seneca Premium

  • Unlimited access to 10,000+ open-ended exam questions

  • Mini-mock exams based on your study history

  • Unlock 800+ premium courses & e-books

Get started with Seneca Premium