Test your knowledge with free interactive questions on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

Poverty as Social Exclusion and Subjective Poverty

The relative definition of poverty is linked to social exclusion, in that people living in relative poverty might find themselves marginalised or excluded from participation in activities such as education and work.

Results of relative poverty

Results of relative poverty

  • People living in relative poverty might live a deprived lifestyle more wide-ranging than being short of money.
  • Relative poverty can lead to homelessness.
  • Relative poverty can lead to poverty in healthcare, whereby people lack the cultural capital that allows them to be fully aware of what health services are available to them.
Social problems

Social problems

  • Poverty at school can lead to or magnify social problems, such as behaviour, lack of parental support, drug addiction and crime.
  • Poverty at work means that people might be forced to take on jobs with low levels of health and safety standards or agree to zero hours contracts.
Environmental issues

Environmental issues

  • The environmental impact of relative poverty can result in people living in undesirable areas, such as near busy roads or polluting industries or with a lack of essential services, including public transport and GP surgeries.
Personal factors

Personal factors

  • There are also personal factors arising from the cumulative effects of poverty, such as poor health, social isolation and low self esteem.
Subjective poverty

Subjective poverty

  • Subjective poverty refers to people’s own feelings about whether or not they see themselves as poor in comparison to the group they identify with.
Subjective poverty cont.

Subjective poverty cont.

  • Some people may see themselves as living in relative poverty because they see those around them as having more money and better lifestyles than them.
  • Conversely, other people might not see themselves as poor because they view themselves as being in the same boat as those around them.

Consensual Approach to Measuring Poverty

Mack and Lansley's (1983, 1990) study attempted to create a consensual definition of poverty to overcome the criticisms of Townsend’s deprivation index.

__Mack and Lansley__

Mack and Lansley

  • Mack and Lansley's (1983, 1990) study attempted to create a consensual definition of poverty to overcome the criticisms of Townsend’s deprivation index.
The consensual definition

The consensual definition

  • The consensual definition came from asking a representative sample of the public to judge what they saw as socially perceived necessities necessary to maintain a minimum standard of living in the UK.
PSE

PSE

  • Gordon et al. (2000) conducted their Poverty and Social Exclusion (PSE) survey on behalf of the Joseph Rowntree Foundation based on the Mack and Lansley’s principles.
Findings

Findings

  • Gordon found that 24 percent of the UK population were living in poverty using Mack and Lansley’s principle of socially perceived necessities.
Jump to other topics
1

Theory & Methods

2

Education with Methods in Context

3

Option 1: Culture & Identity

4

Option 1: Families & Households

5

Option 1: Health

6

Option 1: Work, Poverty & Welfare

7

Option 2: Beliefs in Society

8

Option 2: Global Development

9

Option 2: The Media

10

Crime & Deviance

Practice questions on Types of Poverty 2

Can you answer these? Test yourself with free interactive practice on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Answer all questions on Types of Poverty 2

Unlock your full potential with Seneca Premium

  • Unlimited access to 10,000+ open-ended exam questions

  • Mini-mock exams based on your study history

  • Unlock 800+ premium courses & e-books

Get started with Seneca Premium