1.3.8

Observation

Test yourself

Participant Observation

Participant observation is where the researcher attempts to become an accepted member of the group being studied. Participant observation has many problems associated with it, including practical, ethical and theoretical issues.

Illustrative background for Participant observationIllustrative background for Participant observation ?? "content

Participant observation

  • This method is used by interpretivists, who argue that a sociological understanding of society can only be gained when researchers put themselves in the same position as the people they are studying.
  • Participant observation yields qualitative data.
  • The concept of Verstehen (an understanding developed through empathy or close identification) is seen as important in the use of participant observation.
Illustrative background for Practical problemsIllustrative background for Practical problems ?? "content

Practical problems

  • Practical problems include:
    • Becoming accepted by the group (getting in).
    • Gaining the trust and cooperation of the group (staying in).
    • Leaving the group once the research is concluded (getting out).
Illustrative background for Practical problems cont.Illustrative background for Practical problems cont. ?? "content

Practical problems cont.

  • The researcher may decide to adopt either:
    • An overt role within the group (where those being observed are aware of their status as a researcher).
    • A covert role (where they adopt a cover story to hide their real intentions).
Illustrative background for Ethical issues: covert rolesIllustrative background for Ethical issues: covert roles ?? "content

Ethical issues: covert roles

  • Ethical issues are certain to arise if the researcher has adopted a covert role, however, this may be partly dealt with by telling the people after the research has been conducted.
  • Ethical problems, such as deception, may be justified to protect the researcher, such as with Patrick’s (1973) study of Glasgow gangs.
Illustrative background for Ethical issues: overt roles Illustrative background for Ethical issues: overt roles  ?? "content

Ethical issues: overt roles

  • From an ethical perspective, an overt role is more acceptable, as it allows people to be aware that they are being studied and to provide informed consent.
Illustrative background for Theoretical issuesIllustrative background for Theoretical issues ?? "content

Theoretical issues

  • One theoretical issue concerns reliability.
  • Positivists argue that the data obtained are rarely quantified and are unreliable.
  • The second issue concerns validity.
  • Participant observation assumes that what the researcher recalls and how they have interpreted the situation is accurate, positivists would argue that this unlikely to be the case.

Evaluation of Participant Observation

Participant observation is where the researcher attempts to become an accepted member of the group being studied.

Illustrative background for Advantages Illustrative background for Advantages  ?? "content

Advantages

  • They study people’s normal everyday behaviour.
  • Less likely to impose the sociologist’s own views on the group being studied.
  • Allows for the collection of more in-depth, valid qualitative data than other research methods.
  • Produces more valid data because there is less chance of the researcher being misled than with other methods.
Illustrative background for Advantages cont.Illustrative background for Advantages cont. ?? "content

Advantages cont.

  • Gains in-depth insights into the meanings that a social activity has for those involved by seeing through their eyes (Verstehen).
  • May be the only valid methods for researching closed groups such as criminal gangs and religious sects.
  • Allows for the study of people in their normal everyday lives over a period of time, rather than a ‘snapshot’.
Illustrative background for DisadvantagesIllustrative background for Disadvantages ?? "content

Disadvantages

  • Time-consuming and expensive.
  • Can be stressful for researchers, especially those in a covert role.
  • Data may not be valid or reliable and lack objectivity, according to positivists.
  • Overt role may undermine validity via the Hawthorne effect.
Illustrative background for Disadvantages cont.Illustrative background for Disadvantages cont. ?? "content

Disadvantages cont.

  • Risk of researchers ‘going native’, that is, becoming so involved that they lose objectivity.
  • Only a small group is studied, so may not be representative.
  • Covert participant observation is ethically unsound.

Non-Participant (Structured) Observation

A non-participant observation does not involve the researcher in the activities of those being studied.

Illustrative background for Non-participant observationIllustrative background for Non-participant observation ?? "content

Non-participant observation

  • A non-participant observation does not involve the researcher in the activities of those being studied.
  • It usually involves a checklist of things to observe (the structure), which can then be turned into quantitative data.
  • Positivists are more likely to use this method.
Illustrative background for AdvantagesIllustrative background for Advantages ?? "content

Advantages

  • Not as time-consuming and cheaper than participant observations.
  • Researchers can replicate and check findings.
  • Reduced risk of the Hawthorne effect because the researcher is detached and uninvolved.
Illustrative background for Advantages cont.Illustrative background for Advantages cont. ?? "content

Advantages cont.

  • Easy to make comparisons with similar observations, providing quantitative data so that patterns, trends, and causes can be highlighted.
  • Consent is easily obtained, so more ethically preferable than participant observations.
Illustrative background for DisadvantagesIllustrative background for Disadvantages ?? "content

Disadvantages

  • Not practical to observe all groups.
  • Very difficult to record all observed incidents.
  • The categorisation of observations is influenced by subjective interpretations, so different observers of the same group might record incidents differently.
Illustrative background for Disadvantages cont.Illustrative background for Disadvantages cont. ?? "content

Disadvantages cont.

  • Risk of Hawthorne effect due to the presence of an observer.
  • The use of covert observation devices, such as hidden cameras, are ethically problematic due to the lack of informed consent.
  • Only a small group can be observed, so the sample may not be representative.

Jump to other topics

1Theory & Methods

2Education with Methods in Context

3Option 1: Culture & Identity

4Option 1: Families & Households

5Option 1: Health

6Option 1: Work, Poverty & Welfare

7Option 2: Beliefs in Society

8Option 2: Global Development

9Option 2: The Media

10Crime & Deviance

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson