8.4.2

Should the Constitution Be Codified?

Test yourself on Should the Constitution Be Codified?

Test your knowledge with free interactive questions on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

Should the Constitution Be Codified?

There is much debate over whether the UK should retain its uncodified constitution or whether it should be changed to a codified constitution.

Arguments for codified

Arguments for codified

  • The arguments for a codified constitution include protecting human rights, checks on government power and that there would be more clarity for citizens.
  • A codified constitution provides a stronger protection of human rights.
  • The 1998 Human Rights Act, which adopted the European Convention on Human Rights, is an example of human rights being codified to an extent, however, it still remains weak as parliament can override the act.
For codified: checks & clarity

For codified: checks & clarity

  • A written constitution is far more clear than an unwritten constitution. A codified constitution would improve understanding and public awareness of the constitution in the UK.
  • A codified constitution would ensure that written checks and balances would be in place to limit the power of the executive.
  • Under a codified constitution, parliament would have clear powers to control the executive.

Arguments for uncodified

  • The arguments for an uncodified constitution include that it allows for a strong government, it is flexible, a codified constitution could politicise the judiciary and it is not necessary to be changed.
  • An uncodified constitution allows for a strong government that can carry out actions and deal with issues decisively.
    • Written constitutions can limit any effective government action because of the preventions it puts in place.
For uncodified: difficult process

For uncodified: difficult process

  • Changing to a written constitution would be a difficult process and is not necessary as it has served without major problems in the UK for many years.
    • The UK has many unwritten conventions, such as prerogative powers, which would require writing down into any codified constitution.
Flexible & politicising judiciary

Flexible & politicising judiciary

  • A written constitution could lead to the Supreme Court dealing with disputes over the meaning of the constitution, as is the case in the USA.
    • This would mean the court would become involved in political issues despite not being elected.
  • An uncodified constitution is flexible and can adapt more easily to changes in society than a codified constitution.
    • Following the 2010 general election, an uncodified constitution meant it was easy to develop a new set of principles so that a coalition government could be formed.
Jump to other topics
1

Democracy & Participation

2

Political Parties

3

Electoral Systems

4

Voting Behaviour & the Media

5

Conservatism

6

Liberalism

7

Socialism

8

The UK Constitution

9

The UK Parliament

10

The Prime Minister & the Executive

11

Relationships Between Government Branches

12

US Constitution & Federalism

13

US Congress

14

US Presidency

15

US Supreme Court & Civil Rights

16

US Democracy & Participation

17

Comparing Democracies

18

Feminism

19

Nationalism

Practice questions on Should the Constitution Be Codified?

Can you answer these? Test yourself with free interactive practice on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

  1. 1
Answer all questions on Should the Constitution Be Codified?

Unlock your full potential with Seneca Premium

  • Unlimited access to 10,000+ open-ended exam questions

  • Mini-mock exams based on your study history

  • Unlock 800+ premium courses & e-books

Get started with Seneca Premium