8.4.1

Constitutional Reform & Devolution

Test yourself

Should Constitutional Reforms Since 1997 Be Taken Further?

There is a debate over whether the constitutional reforms since 1997 should be taken further. Some have arguably had success and resulted in democratic improvements, whilst others require further reform.

Illustrative background for Successful reforms  Illustrative background for Successful reforms   ?? "content

Successful reforms

  • Successes include devolution and reform of the judicial system.
  • Devolution has been successful and supported in Scotland and Wales, whilst devolution has helped to ensure peace in Northern Ireland.
    • Regional devolution has led to power being decentralised.
  • The 2005 Constitutional Reform Act established a Supreme Court which is independent of parliament and the government.
Illustrative background for Success: fixed-term & electoral reformIllustrative background for Success: fixed-term & electoral reform ?? "content

Success: fixed-term & electoral reform

  • Fixed-term elections have meant a check on the power of the executive and prevented the prime minister from calling a ‘snap’ election to gain a political advantage over others.
  • Proportional representation is used for elections to devolved assemblies, which has improved the representation of voters.
Illustrative background for Failure: electoral reformIllustrative background for Failure: electoral reform ?? "content

Failure: electoral reform

  • There has not been electoral reform away from first past the post (FPTP) for general elections to parliament.
  • FPTP remains in place which often results in outcomes which are unrepresentative.
    • In 2017 the SNP won 35 seats despite winning 3% of the vote, whilst the Liberal Democrats won 12 seats yet won over 7.4% of the vote.
Illustrative background for Failure: House of LordsIllustrative background for Failure: House of Lords ?? "content

Failure: House of Lords

  • Despite reforms to remove many hereditary peers and make the House of Lords a more professional chamber, further reform is arguably needed.
  • The chamber should arguably become a fully elected and more democratic chamber as it has powers to check legislation and the government.
  • The House of Lords remains entirely unelected and therefore undemocratic.

Debate Over Further Devolution in England

There is debate over whether to extend devolution to the regions in England.

Illustrative background for For further devolution Illustrative background for For further devolution  ?? "content

For further devolution

  • Further devolution would improve accountability by bringing the government closer to people and communities.
  • More devolution would prevent significant differences in living standards between different parts of the UK.
  • Devolution may increase political participation.
  • Having devolved governments would ensure regional problems are better addressed.
Illustrative background for Against further devolutionIllustrative background for Against further devolution ?? "content

Against further devolution

  • Devolution could increase divisions in English society by promoting disunity.
  • Further devolution could result in too many elections taking place which causes voter apathy.
  • There is not significant demand for greater devolution in England.

Jump to other topics

1Democracy & Participation

2Political Parties

3Electoral Systems

4Voting Behaviour & the Media

5Conservatism

6Liberalism

7Socialism

8The UK Constitution

9The UK Parliament

10The Prime Minister & the Executive

11Relationships Between Government Branches

12US Constitution & Federalism

13US Congress

14US Presidency

15US Supreme Court & Civil Rights

16US Democracy & Participation

17Comparing Democracies

18Feminism

19Nationalism

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson