8.4.1

Constitutional Reform & Devolution

Test yourself on Constitutional Reform & Devolution

After reading these notes, test your knowledge with free interactive questions on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

Should Constitutional Reforms Since 1997 Be Taken Further?

There is a debate over whether the constitutional reforms since 1997 should be taken further. Some have arguably had success and resulted in democratic improvements, whilst others require further reform.

Successful reforms

Successful reforms

  • Successes include devolution and reform of the judicial system.
  • Devolution has been successful and supported in Scotland and Wales, whilst devolution has helped to ensure peace in Northern Ireland.
    • Regional devolution has led to power being decentralised.
  • The 2005 Constitutional Reform Act established a Supreme Court which is independent of parliament and the government.
Success: fixed-term & electoral reform

Success: fixed-term & electoral reform

  • Fixed-term elections have meant a check on the power of the executive and prevented the prime minister from calling a ‘snap’ election to gain a political advantage over others.
  • Proportional representation is used for elections to devolved assemblies, which has improved the representation of voters.
Failure: electoral reform

Failure: electoral reform

  • There has not been electoral reform away from first past the post (FPTP) for general elections to parliament.
  • FPTP remains in place which often results in outcomes which are unrepresentative.
    • In 2017 the SNP won 35 seats despite winning 3% of the vote, whilst the Liberal Democrats won 12 seats yet won over 7.4% of the vote.
Failure: House of Lords

Failure: House of Lords

  • Despite reforms to remove many hereditary peers and make the House of Lords a more professional chamber, further reform is arguably needed.
  • The chamber should arguably become a fully elected and more democratic chamber as it has powers to check legislation and the government.
  • The House of Lords remains entirely unelected and therefore undemocratic.

Debate Over Further Devolution in England

There is debate over whether to extend devolution to the regions in England.

For further devolution

For further devolution

  • Further devolution would improve accountability by bringing the government closer to people and communities.
  • More devolution would prevent significant differences in living standards between different parts of the UK.
  • Devolution may increase political participation.
  • Having devolved governments would ensure regional problems are better addressed.
Against further devolution

Against further devolution

  • Devolution could increase divisions in English society by promoting disunity.
  • Further devolution could result in too many elections taking place which causes voter apathy.
  • There is not significant demand for greater devolution in England.
Jump to other topics
1

Democracy & Participation

2

Political Parties

3

Electoral Systems

4

Voting Behaviour & the Media

5

Conservatism

6

Liberalism

7

Socialism

8

The UK Constitution

9

The UK Parliament

10

The Prime Minister & the Executive

11

Relationships Between Government Branches

12

US Constitution & Federalism

13

US Congress

14

US Presidency

15

US Supreme Court & Civil Rights

16

US Democracy & Participation

17

Comparing Democracies

18

Feminism

19

Nationalism

Practice questions on Constitutional Reform & Devolution

Can you answer these? Test yourself with free interactive practice on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
Answer all questions on Constitutional Reform & Devolution

Unlock your full potential with Seneca Premium

  • Unlimited access to 10,000+ open-ended exam questions

  • Mini-mock exams based on your study history

  • Unlock 800+ premium courses & e-books

Get started with Seneca Premium