15.2.1

Appointment Process

Test yourself

Appointment Process

In order to appoint a justice to the Supreme Court, the president must nominate a candidate and the Senate must vote to confirm them.

Illustrative background for Vacancy and nominationIllustrative background for Vacancy and nomination ?? "content

Vacancy and nomination

  • A vacancy occurs when a justice retires, dies or is impeached.
  • The president looks for a suitable candidate, drawing up a shortlist of candidates who are interviewed.
    • The president mainly recruits justices from the federal Courts of Appeals, the state courts and the executive branch.
    • Elena Kagan was Solicitor General at the Department of Justice when nominated in 2010.
  • The president publicly announces their nominee at the White House and the American Bar Association gives the nominee a professional rating.
Illustrative background for Senate confirmationIllustrative background for Senate confirmation ?? "content

Senate confirmation

  • The Senate Judiciary Committee holds a confirmation hearing and votes to recommend whether the candidate should be confirmed by the Senate.
  • The Senate debates and then votes on whether to confirm the nominee. A simple majority is needed for a nominee to be confirmed to the Supreme Court.
Illustrative background for Factors influencing nominationIllustrative background for Factors influencing nomination ?? "content

Factors influencing nomination

  • Supreme Court appointments are important for president’s because the Court has significant power and appointments last for life.
  • A president’s nomination considers a judge’s political outlook, suitability and the balance of judicial philosophies on the Supreme Court.
Illustrative background for Judicial outlookIllustrative background for Judicial outlook ?? "content

Judicial outlook

  • The president will consider the political views and judicial philosophy of the judge they nominate.
  • The nominee often has similar political outlooks to the president, with Republican presidents nominating conservative judges and Democratic presidents nominating liberal justices.
    • The president often chooses a judge who has the same stance on key issues, such as abortion and gun control.
Illustrative background for Experience Illustrative background for Experience  ?? "content

Experience

  • The president will nominate highly experienced judges that are suitable for a role on the most important court in America.
  • All judges are assessed by the American Bar Association on their legal qualifications as part of the appointment process.
    • Chief Justice John Roberts was a judge on the United States Court of Appeals before his nomination to the Supreme Court.
Illustrative background for BalanceIllustrative background for Balance ?? "content

Balance

  • The president takes into account the balance of political views on the Supreme Court.
  • The president’s nomination will usually look to keep the balance on the court between conservative and liberal judges, however, an appointment can swing the balance one way or another.
    • Anthony Kennedy was a swing justice who could not be classified as liberal or conservative and kept a balance between conservatives and liberals on the Supreme Court.

Strengths & Weaknesses of Appointment Process

The appointment process involves many chances to scrutinise and assess a nominee’s suitability for a Supreme Court role, however, it can be politicised by the president, the Senate and the media.

Illustrative background for Strength: checks and balancesIllustrative background for Strength: checks and balances ?? "content

Strength: checks and balances

  • Congress and the president both have a role in appointing Supreme Court judges.
  • The appointment process allows for constitutional checks and balances on the judiciary by the executive and legislative branches.
    • The president nominates a candidate and the Senate votes to confirm or reject them.
Illustrative background for Strength: strong candidatesIllustrative background for Strength: strong candidates ?? "content

Strength: strong candidates

  • Strong Supreme Court candidates are supported by both parties in the Senate’s confirmation vote.
  • This means that the appointment process will ensure suitable and strong candidates are chosen for the Supreme Court, as Senate politicians will not always vote according to their party and political views.
    • Ruth Bader Ginsburg was confirmed by 96-3 in 1993.
    • David Souter was confirmed by 90-9 by a Senate with a Democratic Party majority, despite being nominated by a Republican president, George H. W. Bush.
Illustrative background for Strength: Judicial CommitteeIllustrative background for Strength: Judicial Committee ?? "content

Strength: Judicial Committee

  • The Senate Judicial Committee questions a nominee in detail about their suitability. All committee members ask questions before voting their recommendation to the Senate.
    • Judge Neil Gorsuch faced tough questions as part of a committee hearing which lasted four days.
Illustrative background for Weakness: politicisationIllustrative background for Weakness: politicisation ?? "content

Weakness: politicisation

  • When confirming a judge, the Senate focuses more on a judge’s stance on key issues than on their suitability for the Supreme Court.
    • Robert Bork’s failed confirmation to the Supreme Court in 1987 focused on his views against abortion rather than his qualifications.
  • The president appoints judges whose political views and judicial philosophy is similar to their own.
    • The most liberal members of the court include Elena Kagan, appointed by President Obama, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, appointed by President Clinton.
Illustrative background for Weakness: Judiciary CommitteeIllustrative background for Weakness: Judiciary Committee ?? "content

Weakness: Judiciary Committee

  • The Senate Judiciary Committee is politicised. Members on the committee often vote on party lines (with their political party) rather than on a candidate’s ability.
  • Senate Judiciary Committee members from the opposition party to the president may attack nominees rather than find out information on their suitability.
  • Committee members from the president’s party often ask the nominee soft questions.
Illustrative background for Weakness: mediaIllustrative background for Weakness: media ?? "content

Weakness: media

  • The media is often concerned with issues other than the nominee’s qualifications, particularly in the case of more controversial candidates.
  • Media coverage can make the appointments process more complicated and controversial, can delay votes and change public opinion on the nominee and the appointment process.
    • Clarence Thomas faced several sexual assault allegations in 1991, which became the focus of the media coverage.
  • However, some may argue that media coverage makes the process more transparent.

Jump to other topics

1Democracy & Participation

2Political Parties

3Electoral Systems

4Voting Behaviour & the Media

5Conservatism

6Liberalism

7Socialism

8The UK Constitution

9The UK Parliament

10The Prime Minister & the Executive

11Relationships Between Government Branches

12US Constitution & Federalism

13US Congress

14US Presidency

15US Supreme Court & Civil Rights

16US Democracy & Participation

17Comparing Democracies

18Feminism

19Nationalism

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson