Test your knowledge with free interactive questions on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

Peer-Reviewing

Peer-reviewing is an important step of the process of having an article published, where other scientists provide feedback on the study. It helps to provide a level of quality control to research.

Peer-reviewed journal

Peer-reviewed journal

  • A peer-reviewed journal article is read by several other scientists (generally anonymously) with expertise in the subject matter.
  • These peer reviewers provide feedback - to both the author and the journal editor -regarding the quality of the draft.
  • Ultimately, the journal editor will compile all of the peer reviewer feedback and determine whether the article will be published in its current state (a rare occurrence), published with revisions, or not accepted for publication.
Peer-review feedback

Peer-review feedback

  • Peer reviewers look for a strong rationale for the research being described, a clear description of how the research was conducted, and evidence that the research was conducted in an ethical manner.
  • They look for flaws in the study's design, methods, and statistical analyses.
  • They check that the conclusions drawn by the authors seem reasonable given the observations made during the research.
  • Peer reviewers also comment on how valuable the research is in advancing the discipline’s knowledge.
Use of peer-reviewing

Use of peer-reviewing

  • Peer-reviewing helps prevent unnecessary duplication of research findings in the scientific literature and, to some extent, makes sure that each research article provides new information.
  • Peer review provides some degree of quality control for psychological research.
  • Poorly conceived or executed studies can be weeded out, and even well-designed research can be improved by the revisions suggested.
Peer review for replication

Peer review for replication

  • Peer review also makes sure that the research is described clearly enough to allow other scientists to replicate it, meaning they can repeat the experiment using different samples to determine reliability.
Replication

Replication

  • Each replication of a study serves to provide more evidence to support the original research findings. Often, replications involve additional measures that expand on the original finding.
  • Successful replications of published research make scientists more apt to adopt those findings, while repeated failures tend to cast doubt on the legitimacy of the original article.
Replication example

Replication example

  • For example, it would be a major advancement in the medical field if a published study indicated that taking a new drug helped individuals achieve a healthy weight without changing their diet.
  • But if other scientists could not replicate the results, the original study’s claims would be questioned.
Jump to other topics
1

Principles of Science I

1.1

Structure & Bonding

1.2

Properties of Substances

1.3

Cell Structure & Function

1.4

Cell Specialisation

1.5

Tissue Structure & Function

1.6

Working with Waves

1.7

Waves in Communication

2

Practical Scientific Procedures and Techniques

3

Science Investigation Skills

4

Principles of Science II

4.1

Extracting Elements

4.2

Relating Properties to use of Substances

4.3

Organic Chemistry

4.4

Energy Changes in Industry

4.5

The Circulatory System

4.6

Ventilation & Gas Exchange

4.7

Urinary System

4.8

Cell Transport

4.9

Thermal Physics

4.10

Materials

4.11

Fluids

5

Contemporary Issues in Science

Practice questions on Peer Review

Can you answer these? Test yourself with free interactive practice on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
Answer all questions on Peer Review

Unlock your full potential with Seneca Premium

  • Unlimited access to 10,000+ open-ended exam questions

  • Mini-mock exams based on your study history

  • Unlock 800+ premium courses & e-books

Get started with Seneca Premium