4.1.3

Interactionist Explanations of Crime

Test yourself on Interactionist Explanations of Crime

Test your knowledge with free interactive questions on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

Interactionist Explanations of Crime

Interactionists believe in labelling.

Labelling

Labelling

  • Interactionists believe in labelling.
  • This is where people or acts are given a tag that defines them as deviant based on the time, place, culture etc.
  • They look at people’s relationships and try to establish what is perceived as crime and how people react to it.
Example

Example

  • Findings of the BCS (British Crime Survey):
    • Young black males are stopped and searched more often in comparison to any other group because police seem to think it is more likely for them to engage in criminal activities.
Criticisms of interactionist explanations

Criticisms of interactionist explanations

  • They put the blame on those who define an act as deviant rather than the deviant person.
  • They believe that an act isn’t deviant until others perceive it as such.
  • They don’t explain why one becomes deviant.

Labelling Theory (Becker, 1963)

Becker was an interactionist who believed in labelling.
Becker H S, Outsiders, New York, The Free Press, 1963.

Becker

Becker

  • Becker was an interactionist who believed in labelling.
  • He believed that once a label (such as 'delinquent' or 'criminal') is attached to someone, it is likely that they will live up to this label.
  • This is known as a self-fulfilling prophecy; even if they don't want to become this, they cannot shake the label and they become it.
  • Interactionists study the effect of individuals’ interactions on their behaviour.
Interactionism and deviance

Interactionism and deviance

  • Because he was an interactionist, Becker believed that an act only becomes deviant when others define it as such.
  • I.e. who commits the act, when and where it is committed, who observes it, and the negotiation between the actors involved in the interaction.
  • He thought that all these factors come together to determine whether the deviant/criminal label will be applied.
Example

Example

  • For example, the actions of young people that are convicted for breaking the law, lead to those young people to be labelled.
  • The agents of social control, e.g. the police and the courts, have the power to make the label stick.
  • This label then becomes a master status, i.e a label that overrides all the other labels that one has, and this eventually affects how others see them.
Self-fulfilling prophecy

Self-fulfilling prophecy

  • As a consequence the individuals will live up to this label, producing a self-fulfilling prophecy.
  • The individual who has been labelled as deviant is rejected from society because of negative assumptions about their future behaviour; which may then encourage further deviance, which leads to a deviant career.
Deviant subculture

Deviant subculture

  • This might lead him to join an organised deviant group by forming a deviant subculture, which develops beliefs and values which justify and support deviant behaviours.
Jump to other topics
1

The Sociological Approach

2

Families

3

Education

4

Crime & Deviance

5

Social Stratification

6

Sociological Research Methods

Practice questions on Interactionist Explanations of Crime

Can you answer these? Test yourself with free interactive practice on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
Answer all questions on Interactionist Explanations of Crime

Unlock your full potential with Seneca Premium

  • Unlimited access to 10,000+ open-ended exam questions

  • Mini-mock exams based on your study history

  • Unlock 800+ premium courses & e-books

Get started with Seneca Premium