2.1.5
Discussion Points - Telos & Double Effect Doctrine
Test your knowledge with free interactive questions on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.
Debates about Telos and the Doctrine of Double Effect
Can we measure how right/wrong or good/bad something is based on its success in meeting its telos? Does the universe have a telos? Can the doctrine of double effect actually justify any actions?
Wrong actions by natural law
- Natural law implies that the purpose of sexual intercourse is reproduction.
- So artificial contraception, masturbation and homosexual sexual activity are considered to be wrong because they do not allow for the production of new life.
Catholic & counter-arguments
- Although the Catholic Church supports this view, many people challenge it today.
- Sexual relationships are viewed beyond the physical, which natural law does not acknowledge.
- The telos of sexual activity could be unity or strengthening of a relationship and this could happen between unmarried couples and homosexual couples.
Does the universe have a telos?
- Some argue the universe does not have a telos.
- If someone does not accept that the world was created by God, then its creation and the universe is random and changeable.
- Concepts that were once considered “natural” are then challenged.
- The primary precept of reproduction entirely assumes that the female purpose is to have children. Many people would consider this notion to be old-fashioned and challenges the idea that there is one single pre-established end.
Can the doctrine justify acts?
- The doctrine of double effect allows for some flexibility in natural law when the moral problem seems impossible.
- Aquinas uses the example of self-defence to illustrate his point.
- If we are being attacked, we may use proportionate force to save ourselves. If this results in the death of our attacker, this is lawful as long as we used proportionate force and our intention was to save our own life.
Issue with doctrine: motives
- Aquinas is concerned with motives. Herein lies the problem. We cannot know someone’s true motives.
- They may say they acted to save their life, but how can we really know? This then opens the door to the doctrine being abused when the agent says they acted with good motives when really they did not.
1Philosophy of Religion
1.1Ancient Philosophical Influences: Plato
1.2Ancient Philosophical Influences: Aristotle
1.3Ancient Philosophical Influences: Soul, Mind, Body
1.4The Existence of God - Arguments from Observation
1.5The Existence of God - Arguments from Reason
1.6Religious Experience
1.7The Problem of Evil
1.8The Nature & Attributes of God
1.9Religious Language: Negative, Analogical, Symbolic
2Religion & Ethics
2.1Natural Law
2.2Situation Ethics
2.3Kantian Ethics
2.4Utilitarianism
2.5Euthanasia
2.6Business Ethics
2.7Meta-Ethical Theories
2.8Conscience
3Developments in Christian Thought
3.1Saint Augustine's Teachings
3.2Death & the Afterlife
3.3Knowledge of God's Existence
3.4The Person of Jesus Christ
3.5Christian Moral Principles
3.6Christian Moral Action
3.7Development - Pluralism & Theology
3.8Development - Pluralism & Society
3.9Gender & Society
3.10Gender & Theology
Jump to other topics
1Philosophy of Religion
1.1Ancient Philosophical Influences: Plato
1.2Ancient Philosophical Influences: Aristotle
1.3Ancient Philosophical Influences: Soul, Mind, Body
1.4The Existence of God - Arguments from Observation
1.5The Existence of God - Arguments from Reason
1.6Religious Experience
1.7The Problem of Evil
1.8The Nature & Attributes of God
1.9Religious Language: Negative, Analogical, Symbolic
2Religion & Ethics
2.1Natural Law
2.2Situation Ethics
2.3Kantian Ethics
2.4Utilitarianism
2.5Euthanasia
2.6Business Ethics
2.7Meta-Ethical Theories
2.8Conscience
3Developments in Christian Thought
3.1Saint Augustine's Teachings
3.2Death & the Afterlife
3.3Knowledge of God's Existence
3.4The Person of Jesus Christ
3.5Christian Moral Principles
3.6Christian Moral Action
3.7Development - Pluralism & Theology
3.8Development - Pluralism & Society
3.9Gender & Society
3.10Gender & Theology
Practice questions on Discussion Points - Telos & Double Effect Doctrine
Can you answer these? Test yourself with free interactive practice on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.
- 1Which of these is NOT considered wrong under natural law? Multiple choice
- 2
Unlock your full potential with Seneca Premium
Unlimited access to 10,000+ open-ended exam questions
Mini-mock exams based on your study history
Unlock 800+ premium courses & e-books