1.10.4

Falsification Symposium: Mitchell

Test yourself

Falsification Symposium: Mitchell's Theory

Mitchell disagreed with the theory of ‘bliks’ and suggested another way of using religious language, using another parable.

Illustrative background for Belief & language based on factIllustrative background for Belief & language based on fact ?? "content

Belief & language based on fact

  • Mitchell claimed that religious belief, and therefore religious language, is based upon fact, although they are not straightforwardly verifiable or falsifiable.
  • He used the idea of a resistance fighter to make his point.
Illustrative background for Resistance movement exampleIllustrative background for Resistance movement example ?? "content

Resistance movement example

  • 'A member of the resistance movement is met one day by a man claiming to be the leader of the resistance movement. The fighter is suitably impressed and pledges his loyalty to the stranger. As time goes on, the fighter sees the ‘leader’ helping out the resistance, but at other times he is apparently helping out the enemy. The fighter nevertheless carries on in his belief that the stranger is, in fact, the leader of the resistance movement'.
Illustrative background for Difference: Mitchell & HareIllustrative background for Difference: Mitchell & Hare ?? "content

Difference: Mitchell & Hare

  • Hare’s 'lunatic' has a) no reason for mistrusting dons and b) won't allow anything to count against his belief.
  • Mitchell’s fighter, however, is a) willing to admit that things count against his belief in the leader (a symbol of God) and b) grounds his belief in reason and fact: he trusts this man who claims to be the leader and has examples of him fighting for the resistance.
Illustrative background for Mitchell's criticism of FlewIllustrative background for Mitchell's criticism of Flew ?? "content

Mitchell's criticism of Flew

  • Mitchell claimed that Flew missed the point that believers have a prior commitment to trust in God based on faith. For this reason, they do not allow evidence to undermine their faith.
Illustrative background for Mitchell's conclusionsIllustrative background for Mitchell's conclusions ?? "content

Mitchell's conclusions

  • Mitchell’s point is that religious belief is based upon facts, but that belief cannot be verified/falsified in the simplistic way that the logical positivists demand.
  • Of course, the stranger in the story will be able to reveal his true allegiance after the war and explain his mysterious behaviour, in the same way that all the peculiar and problematic parts of religious belief will be revealed at the end of time according to traditional religious belief.

Jump to other topics

1Philosophy of Religion

1.1Ancient Philosophical Influences: Plato

1.2Ancient Philosophical Influences: Aristotle

1.3Ancient Philosophical Influences: Soul, Mind, Body

1.4The Existence of God - Arguments from Observation

1.5The Existence of God - Arguments from Reason

1.6Religious Experience

1.7The Problem of Evil

1.8The Nature & Attributes of God

1.9Religious Language: Negative, Analogical, Symbolic

1.10Religious Language: 20th Century Perspective

2Religion & Ethics

3Developments in Christian Thought

3.1Saint Augustine's Teachings

3.2Death & the Afterlife

3.3Knowledge of God's Existence

3.4The Person of Jesus Christ

3.5Christian Moral Principles

3.6Christian Moral Action

3.7Development - Pluralism & Theology

3.8Development - Pluralism & Society

3.9Gender & Society

3.10Gender & Theology

3.11Challenges

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson