1.9.3

Discussion Points: Religious Language

Test yourself

Does the Via Negativa Help Us to Understand Theology?

Here are arguments for and against the idea that the via negativa helps us to understand theological discussions.

Illustrative background for Cole: helps understand GodIllustrative background for Cole: helps understand God ?? "content

Cole: helps understand God

  • Peter Cole says it provides insight and understanding of God "by denying all descriptions of God, you get insight into God rather than unbelief...”.
Illustrative background for For: avoids anthropomorphismIllustrative background for For: avoids anthropomorphism ?? "content

For: avoids anthropomorphism

  • Some people argue that the via negativa argument avoids anthropomorphism (giving human characteristics to an animal or God).
Illustrative background for James: facilitates explanationIllustrative background for James: facilitates explanation ?? "content

James: facilitates explanation

  • William James argued that religious experience is often ineffable.
    • This means that people are unable to adequately describe or explain the experience they have had.
  • It's likely James would recognise the strength of the via negativa as it provides recipients of a religious experience with the ability to explain what has occurred to them.
Illustrative background for Flew: argues God into nothingnessIllustrative background for Flew: argues God into nothingness ?? "content

Flew: argues God into nothingness

  • But the via negativa defines God into nothingness.
  • In his essay Theology and Falsification, Anthony Flew argued that if we try to explain God by saying that he is invisible, soundless, incorporeal and so on, there is very little difference between our definition of God and our definition of nothingness.
  • Flew suggests that we argue God out of existence by a ‘thousand qualifications’. In other words, if we continually outline what God is not, we eventually end up with nothingness.

Do Analogies Help Us Express Ideas About God?

Here are arguments for and against the idea that Aquinas' analogies of attribution and proper proportion help us express ideas about God.

Illustrative background for For: ideas beyond human referenceIllustrative background for For: ideas beyond human reference ?? "content

For: ideas beyond human reference

  • Analogies allow us to use things in our framework of reference to understand things outside of it.
    • For example, in the teleological argument and Paley’s analogy of the watch, we are given a framework in which we can understand God as a designer of the world.
  • Analogies refer to things understandable in our world to help us gain an understanding of God beyond our world.
Illustrative background for For: Plato's analogy of the caveIllustrative background for For: Plato's analogy of the cave ?? "content

For: Plato's analogy of the cave

  • Another famous analogy used to understand a higher being was Plato’s analogy of the cave.
  • This analogy helped people speak meaningfully about the metaphysical concept of the world of forms.
Illustrative background for For: avoids anthropomorphismIllustrative background for For: avoids anthropomorphism ?? "content

For: avoids anthropomorphism

  • Analogies avoid anthropomorphising God (assigning human characteristics to God). They do so because the words used about God are not meant to be taken literally.
Illustrative background for Against: logical positive viewIllustrative background for Against: logical positive view ?? "content

Against: logical positive view

  • But the logical positivists (such as A.J. Ayer) were a group of scholars who argued that any language used about God is not meaningful, so it is not effective.
Illustrative background for Against: Darwin & DawkinsIllustrative background for Against: Darwin & Dawkins ?? "content

Against: Darwin & Dawkins

  • Aquinas based his work upon a number of religious assumptions. Aquinas believed that God was responsible for the creation of the earth and he also believed that humans were created ‘in the image of God’ as is stated in Genesis.
  • Darwin and Dawkins refuted the idea that we were created. If one doesn’t accept assumptions on God being the creator of the universe, one doesn’t have to accept the idea that we can work out what God is like by examining a creation that may or may not be his.

Can We Understand Religious Language if it's Symbolic?

Here are arguments for and against the idea that we can't understand religious language if it's meant to be symbolic.

Illustrative background for For: symbols change over timeIllustrative background for For: symbols change over time ?? "content

For: symbols change over time

  • Symbols can change over time.
  • Tillich acknowledged this problem; that the power of symbols changes through time.
    • For example, consider the swastika symbol. It began as a Hindu symbol used to represent good fortune, luck and wellbeing. However, the symbol has changed dramatically due to its association with Adolph Hitler and the Nazi Party.
  • Therefore, symbols might not offer the correct understanding of God that they were originally intended to have.
Illustrative background for Against: greater meaningsIllustrative background for Against: greater meanings ?? "content

Against: greater meanings

  • Tillich argued that symbols play an incredibly important role in Christian faith.
  • Symbols always point beyond themselves.
    • For example, the red candle that continually burns in a Catholic Church is symbolic of the presence of God. When the candle is lit, Christians believe that God is present with them.
    • Likewise, the Lamb of God is symbolic of the sacrifice Jesus made as it links with the story of the Passover from the Old Testament.
Illustrative background for Against: painting analogy Illustrative background for Against: painting analogy  ?? "content

Against: painting analogy

  • Tillich maintained that religious language is a symbolic way of pointing towards the ultimate reality (God).
  • Tillich used the example of a painting. He said: “it is possible to describe a painting but the description is useless without having the painting there.”
  • Tillich believed that religious language works in the same way. It is possible to describe God, but the description becomes more meaningful with a visual symbol.

Jump to other topics

1Philosophy of Religion

1.1Ancient Philosophical Influences: Plato

1.2Ancient Philosophical Influences: Aristotle

1.3Ancient Philosophical Influences: Soul, Mind, Body

1.4The Existence of God - Arguments from Observation

1.5The Existence of God - Arguments from Reason

1.6Religious Experience

1.7The Problem of Evil

1.8The Nature & Attributes of God

1.9Religious Language: Negative, Analogical, Symbolic

1.10Religious Language: 20th Century Perspective

2Religion & Ethics

3Developments in Christian Thought

3.1Saint Augustine's Teachings

3.2Death & the Afterlife

3.3Knowledge of God's Existence

3.4The Person of Jesus Christ

3.5Christian Moral Principles

3.6Christian Moral Action

3.7Development - Pluralism & Theology

3.8Development - Pluralism & Society

3.9Gender & Society

3.10Gender & Theology

3.11Challenges

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson