1.3.3
Materialism - Ryle’s Philosophical Behaviourism
Materialism: Ryle’s Philosophical Behaviourism
Materialism: Ryle’s Philosophical Behaviourism
Materialism is the belief that there is one substance which is matter and everything else is reducible to it, including the mind.
Modern materialism
Modern materialism
- Modern materialism was partly made possible by the effect of Cartesian (Descartes) dualism on western thought.
- If matter is just extension and mind is non-spatial, then it is simple to bracket off the mind and focus purely on the physical substance.
Ryle’s Philosophical Behaviourism
Ryle’s Philosophical Behaviourism
- Gilbert Ryle calls Descartes’ theory ‘the ghost in the machine’ (ghost=mind, machine=body).
- According to Ryle, there is no mind which exists as a separate entity to the body and to search for one is to make a category mistake.
- By this, he means that the brain and mind belong to different logical categories but have mistakenly been associated together.
Ryle's Cambridge/Oxford analogy
Ryle's Cambridge/Oxford analogy
- One analogy for this is the foreigner who, visiting Cambridge or Oxford University for the first time, is shown all the different colleges and buildings but then asks ‘where is the University?’
- The mistake is that he is looking for something separate from all the buildings he has been shown without realising that he has already seen the university.
- In just the same way, Ryle argues that dualists are mistakenly searching for something over and above the brain, or behaviour, called the mind.
'Mental' events = specific pattern
'Mental' events = specific pattern
- Ryle was a philosophical behaviourist who saw ‘mental’ events as just referring to a specific pattern of behaviour. ‘Mind’ is no longer internal; it is what we do with our bodies.
- Eg. when someone is depressed or angry or joyful, we look at the pattern of behaviour they exhibit in each different case. We cannot see beyond this behaviour
- So mental terminology actually means something physical (eg. behaviour).
Limitations of Ryle's Philosophical Behaviourism
Limitations of Ryle's Philosophical Behaviourism
Ryle was a philosophical behaviourist – who saw ‘mental’ events as just referring to a specific pattern of behaviour - ‘mind’ is no longer internal; it is what we do with our bodies.
Counter-intuitive to humans
Counter-intuitive to humans
- This approach is counter-intuitive to humans as subjects who have what they perceive as internal states of mind.
- Some of these internal states may not manifest as outward patterns of behaviour at all – so do they not exist?
Ryle's explanation for wishing
Ryle's explanation for wishing
- Ryle partly anticipates problematic states such as wishing, which seems to have no particular pattern of behaviour attached to it, by talking about ‘dispositions to behave’.
- Appropriate behaviour is regarded as potential and can be anticipated given certain circumstances. So a person wishing to go on holiday may spend a lot of time on travel websites, for instance.
Ward's criticism of Ryle
Ward's criticism of Ryle
- Ward feels Ryle’s account is inadequate.
- Firstly, what about pretending? Someone who pretends to be angry and someone who is angry may exhibit the exact same behaviour, but one of them is not experiencing the same internal state.
Ward's criticism of Ryle
Ward's criticism of Ryle
- Secondly, we do know our experience from the inside. When we feel pain, for instance, we know that such a feeling cannot be completely captured by a description of the way we behave when we feel it.
- Thirdly, what about self-awareness? It is impossible to say how being aware of yourself as a thinking being is capable of being described in terms of behaviour or a ‘disposition to behave’ in a certain way.
1Philosophy of Religion
1.1Ancient Philosophical Influences: Plato
1.2Ancient Philosophical Influences: Aristotle
1.3Ancient Philosophical Influences: Soul, Mind, Body
1.4The Existence of God - Arguments from Observation
1.5The Existence of God - Arguments from Reason
1.6Religious Experience
1.7The Problem of Evil
1.8The Nature & Attributes of God
1.9Religious Language: Negative, Analogical, Symbolic
2Religion & Ethics
2.1Natural Law
2.2Situation Ethics
2.3Kantian Ethics
2.4Utilitarianism
2.5Euthanasia
3Developments in Christian Thought
3.1Saint Augustine's Teachings
3.2Death & the Afterlife
3.3Knowledge of God's Existence
3.4The Person of Jesus Christ
3.5Christian Moral Principles
3.6Christian Moral Action
3.7Development - Pluralism & Theology
3.8Development - Pluralism & Society
3.9Gender & Society
3.10Gender & Theology
Jump to other topics
1Philosophy of Religion
1.1Ancient Philosophical Influences: Plato
1.2Ancient Philosophical Influences: Aristotle
1.3Ancient Philosophical Influences: Soul, Mind, Body
1.4The Existence of God - Arguments from Observation
1.5The Existence of God - Arguments from Reason
1.6Religious Experience
1.7The Problem of Evil
1.8The Nature & Attributes of God
1.9Religious Language: Negative, Analogical, Symbolic
2Religion & Ethics
2.1Natural Law
2.2Situation Ethics
2.3Kantian Ethics
2.4Utilitarianism
2.5Euthanasia
3Developments in Christian Thought
3.1Saint Augustine's Teachings
3.2Death & the Afterlife
3.3Knowledge of God's Existence
3.4The Person of Jesus Christ
3.5Christian Moral Principles
3.6Christian Moral Action
3.7Development - Pluralism & Theology
3.8Development - Pluralism & Society
3.9Gender & Society
3.10Gender & Theology
Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring
Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home
Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs
30+ school subjects covered