1.3.3

Materialism - Ryle’s Philosophical Behaviourism

Test yourself

Materialism: Ryle’s Philosophical Behaviourism

Materialism is the belief that there is one substance which is matter and everything else is reducible to it, including the mind.

Illustrative background for Modern materialism Illustrative background for Modern materialism  ?? "content

Modern materialism

  • Modern materialism was partly made possible by the effect of Cartesian (Descartes) dualism on western thought.
    • If matter is just extension and mind is non-spatial, then it is simple to bracket off the mind and focus purely on the physical substance.
Illustrative background for Ryle’s Philosophical BehaviourismIllustrative background for Ryle’s Philosophical Behaviourism ?? "content

Ryle’s Philosophical Behaviourism

  • Gilbert Ryle calls Descartes’ theory ‘the ghost in the machine’ (ghost=mind, machine=body).
  • According to Ryle, there is no mind which exists as a separate entity to the body and to search for one is to make a category mistake.
  • By this, he means that the brain and mind belong to different logical categories but have mistakenly been associated together.
Illustrative background for Ryle's Cambridge/Oxford analogyIllustrative background for Ryle's Cambridge/Oxford analogy ?? "content

Ryle's Cambridge/Oxford analogy

  • One analogy for this is the foreigner who, visiting Cambridge or Oxford University for the first time, is shown all the different colleges and buildings but then asks ‘where is the University?’
  • The mistake is that he is looking for something separate from all the buildings he has been shown without realising that he has already seen the university.
  • In just the same way, Ryle argues that dualists are mistakenly searching for something over and above the brain, or behaviour, called the mind.
Illustrative background for 'Mental' events = specific patternIllustrative background for 'Mental' events = specific pattern ?? "content

'Mental' events = specific pattern

  • Ryle was a philosophical behaviourist who saw ‘mental’ events as just referring to a specific pattern of behaviour. ‘Mind’ is no longer internal; it is what we do with our bodies.
    • Eg. when someone is depressed or angry or joyful, we look at the pattern of behaviour they exhibit in each different case. We cannot see beyond this behaviour
  • So mental terminology actually means something physical (eg. behaviour).

Limitations of Ryle's Philosophical Behaviourism

Ryle was a philosophical behaviourist – who saw ‘mental’ events as just referring to a specific pattern of behaviour - ‘mind’ is no longer internal; it is what we do with our bodies.

Illustrative background for Counter-intuitive to humansIllustrative background for Counter-intuitive to humans ?? "content

Counter-intuitive to humans

  • This approach is counter-intuitive to humans as subjects who have what they perceive as internal states of mind.
    • Some of these internal states may not manifest as outward patterns of behaviour at all – so do they not exist?
Illustrative background for Ryle's explanation for wishingIllustrative background for Ryle's explanation for wishing ?? "content

Ryle's explanation for wishing

  • Ryle partly anticipates problematic states such as wishing, which seems to have no particular pattern of behaviour attached to it, by talking about ‘dispositions to behave’.
  • Appropriate behaviour is regarded as potential and can be anticipated given certain circumstances. So a person wishing to go on holiday may spend a lot of time on travel websites, for instance.
Illustrative background for Ward's criticism of RyleIllustrative background for Ward's criticism of Ryle ?? "content

Ward's criticism of Ryle

  • Ward feels Ryle’s account is inadequate.
    • Firstly, what about pretending? Someone who pretends to be angry and someone who is angry may exhibit the exact same behaviour, but one of them is not experiencing the same internal state.
Illustrative background for Ward's criticism of RyleIllustrative background for Ward's criticism of Ryle ?? "content

Ward's criticism of Ryle

  • Secondly, we do know our experience from the inside. When we feel pain, for instance, we know that such a feeling cannot be completely captured by a description of the way we behave when we feel it.
  • Thirdly, what about self-awareness? It is impossible to say how being aware of yourself as a thinking being is capable of being described in terms of behaviour or a ‘disposition to behave’ in a certain way.

Jump to other topics

1Philosophy of Religion

1.1Ancient Philosophical Influences: Plato

1.2Ancient Philosophical Influences: Aristotle

1.3Ancient Philosophical Influences: Soul, Mind, Body

1.4The Existence of God - Arguments from Observation

1.5The Existence of God - Arguments from Reason

1.6Religious Experience

1.7The Problem of Evil

1.8The Nature & Attributes of God

1.9Religious Language: Negative, Analogical, Symbolic

1.10Religious Language: 20th Century Perspective

2Religion & Ethics

3Developments in Christian Thought

3.1Saint Augustine's Teachings

3.2Death & the Afterlife

3.3Knowledge of God's Existence

3.4The Person of Jesus Christ

3.5Christian Moral Principles

3.6Christian Moral Action

3.7Development - Pluralism & Theology

3.8Development - Pluralism & Society

3.9Gender & Society

3.10Gender & Theology

3.11Challenges

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson