1.5.1
The Ontological Argument
A Priori Arguments
A Priori Arguments
Arguments based on reason are valid a priori, without the need to refer to observations from experience.
![Illustrative background for *A priori* arguments](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2020-06/e274ce54-f6bd-4809-b7d3-4bf94cf2701c/socrates-,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
![Illustrative background for *A priori* arguments ?? "content](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2020-06/e274ce54-f6bd-4809-b7d3-4bf94cf2701c/socrates-,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
A priori arguments
A priori arguments
- A priori arguments are simply logically true in the same way that the following argument is logically true:
- All men are mortal;
- Socrates is a man;
- Therefore, Socrates is mortal.
![Illustrative background for *A priori* = true by definition](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/courseImages/physics/1.4.2 Equilibrium/math-1500720_640-min,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
![Illustrative background for *A priori* = true by definition ?? "content](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/courseImages/physics/1.4.2 Equilibrium/math-1500720_640-min,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
A priori = true by definition
A priori = true by definition
- A priori arguments are true by definition - in the same way that 2 & plus;2 = 4 is true by definition as another way of defining 2 + 2 is to call it 4.
- If it can be shown that God exists by definition, then a priori arguments work.
The Ontological Argument
The Ontological Argument
The argument is known in different forms. The generally accepted classical formulation is from Anselm (1033-1109). It is found in chapters 2-4 of his work Proslogion.
![Illustrative background for Logical deductive argument](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-08/cdfe3b56-842f-4854-bd5a-425c0208cd03/failure-,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
![Illustrative background for Logical deductive argument ?? "content](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-08/cdfe3b56-842f-4854-bd5a-425c0208cd03/failure-,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Logical deductive argument
Logical deductive argument
- The logical demonstration in the argument either totally succeeds or totally fails – it is a logical deductive argument.
![Illustrative background for Anselm’s argument (1st form)](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2019-06/c1d1c9a1-ce98-4906-9b4a-763357951d14/step1-1,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
![Illustrative background for Anselm’s argument (1st form) ?? "content](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2019-06/c1d1c9a1-ce98-4906-9b4a-763357951d14/step1-1,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Anselm’s argument (1st form)
Anselm’s argument (1st form)
- God is that which nothing greater can be conceived (call this ABC).
- Even the atheist can have this definition in his understanding.
- But if he has it in his understanding (ie in the mind) only, then there must be a greater being who exists both in the mind and reality (it is greater to exist both in the mind and reality).
- So, by the definition ABC, God must exist both in the mind and in reality.
![Illustrative background for Self-contradiction (1st form)](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-08/9a76d1fd-635f-49a5-bd37-36d7c22782cf/brain-mri,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
![Illustrative background for Self-contradiction (1st form) ?? "content](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2018-08/9a76d1fd-635f-49a5-bd37-36d7c22782cf/brain-mri,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Self-contradiction (1st form)
Self-contradiction (1st form)
- Another way of saying this is that it is self-contradictory to be capable of conceiving something that nothing greater can be thought, and at the same time to deny that something really exists.
![Illustrative background for Anselm’s Argument (2nd form)](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2020-06/be0366ab-0814-4c41-acba-b774521b5ecc/impossible-4505790_1920,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
![Illustrative background for Anselm’s Argument (2nd form)
?? "content](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2020-06/be0366ab-0814-4c41-acba-b774521b5ecc/impossible-4505790_1920,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Anselm’s Argument (2nd form)
Anselm’s Argument (2nd form)
- The second form of the argument is developed to show the impossibility of conceiving of God as not existing.
- God cannot not be. Any lesser form of existence where it was possible not to be would not fit with the definition of God.
![Illustrative background for Theory of the 2nd form](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2019-06/2852a728-a8f9-4d18-8531-8ade4688f9ba/2-step-2,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
![Illustrative background for Theory of the 2nd form ?? "content](https://image-v2.cdn.app.senecalearning.com/2019-06/2852a728-a8f9-4d18-8531-8ade4688f9ba/2-step-2,h_400,q_80,w_640.jpg)
Theory of the 2nd form
Theory of the 2nd form
- God is ABC (see 1st form).
- It is greater to be a necessary being than a contingent being.
- If God exists only contingently, it would be possible to imagine a greater being who exists necessarily.
- But if God is ABC, then that being has to be God
- So God must be a necessary being and exist in reality.
- It is important to note that this is logical necessity and not factual necessity (the kind of necessity arrived at in the cosmological argument).
1Philosophy of Religion
1.1Ancient Philosophical Influences: Plato
1.2Ancient Philosophical Influences: Aristotle
1.3Ancient Philosophical Influences: Soul, Mind, Body
1.4The Existence of God - Arguments from Observation
1.5The Existence of God - Arguments from Reason
1.6Religious Experience
1.7The Problem of Evil
1.8The Nature & Attributes of God
1.9Religious Language: Negative, Analogical, Symbolic
2Religion & Ethics
2.1Natural Law
2.2Situation Ethics
2.3Kantian Ethics
2.4Utilitarianism
2.5Euthanasia
3Developments in Christian Thought
3.1Saint Augustine's Teachings
3.2Death & the Afterlife
3.3Knowledge of God's Existence
3.4The Person of Jesus Christ
3.5Christian Moral Principles
3.6Christian Moral Action
3.7Development - Pluralism & Theology
3.8Development - Pluralism & Society
3.9Gender & Society
3.10Gender & Theology
Jump to other topics
1Philosophy of Religion
1.1Ancient Philosophical Influences: Plato
1.2Ancient Philosophical Influences: Aristotle
1.3Ancient Philosophical Influences: Soul, Mind, Body
1.4The Existence of God - Arguments from Observation
1.5The Existence of God - Arguments from Reason
1.6Religious Experience
1.7The Problem of Evil
1.8The Nature & Attributes of God
1.9Religious Language: Negative, Analogical, Symbolic
2Religion & Ethics
2.1Natural Law
2.2Situation Ethics
2.3Kantian Ethics
2.4Utilitarianism
2.5Euthanasia
3Developments in Christian Thought
3.1Saint Augustine's Teachings
3.2Death & the Afterlife
3.3Knowledge of God's Existence
3.4The Person of Jesus Christ
3.5Christian Moral Principles
3.6Christian Moral Action
3.7Development - Pluralism & Theology
3.8Development - Pluralism & Society
3.9Gender & Society
3.10Gender & Theology
![Go student ad image](/en-GB/revision-notes/_next/image?url=%2Fen-GB%2Frevision-notes%2Fimages%2Fgo-student-uk-ad.jpg&w=640&q=100)
Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring
Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home
Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs
30+ school subjects covered