10.5.2

The Critics

Test yourself

Eric Bentley

For Eric Bentley, the play is not a satisfactory tragedy.

Illustrative background for Lack of terror Illustrative background for Lack of terror  ?? "content

Lack of terror

  • Bentley argues that, although audiences may feel “pity”, Willy is too lowly and pathetic a figure to inspire “terror”.
Illustrative background for Lack of resolution Illustrative background for Lack of resolution  ?? "content

Lack of resolution

  • Bentley also argued that the play never resolves the question of who is responsible for Willy’s death: is Willy the victim of his own tragic flaw or is he brought down by external (e.g. socio-economic) forces?
Illustrative background for No man's landIllustrative background for No man's land ?? "content

No man's land

  • For Bentley, Miller’s play falls between two stools – the tragedy and the socio-political play – and, as a result, ends up being neither.

Harold Bloom

For Harold Bloom, the play is a tragedy “despite itself”.

Illustrative background for Not a tragedyIllustrative background for Not a tragedy ?? "content

Not a tragedy

  • The play does not work as a tragedy in that Willy never achieves self-knowledge and the society of the play is not “cleansed” by Willy’s death.
Illustrative background for A tragedy Illustrative background for A tragedy  ?? "content

A tragedy

  • But Willy’s death leads to Biff’s path to self-knowledge, while also “releasing” Biff from following Willy’s destructive dream.

Stephen Barker

Stephen Barker sees the play as a Nietzschean tragedy.

Illustrative background for NietzscheIllustrative background for Nietzsche ?? "content

Nietzsche

  • The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) argued that human life was essentially meaningless and that “God is dead”.
  • Nietzsche saw tragedy as an art-form allowing audiences to recognise this truth.
Illustrative background for Lack of closure Illustrative background for Lack of closure  ?? "content

Lack of closure

  • For Nietzsche, tragedy does not offer closure or understanding and Barker argues that Death of a Salesman conforms to this.
  • Willy kills himself for nothing and that Linda is the key figure in the play’s closing Requiem in that she does not understand Willy’s final act: “Why did you do it?”
Illustrative background for LiesIllustrative background for Lies ?? "content

Lies

  • Barker also sees the play as a Nietzschean tragedy in that it conforms to Nietzsche’s views that, as life was often unbearably cruel and painful, human beings essentially lie to each other in order to survive.
  • For Barker, Willy has spent his life lying to himself about who he really is and the Requiem shows that Happy will continue to follow Willy’s delusions (“he had a good dream”).

Jump to other topics

1Introduction

2Act One

3Act Two

4Extended Passage Analysis

5Character Profiles

6Key Themes

7Writing Techniques

8Historical Context

9Literary Context

10Critical Debates

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson