1.2.8

Specific Impacts on Ionisation Energies

Test yourself on Specific Impacts on Ionisation Energies

Test your knowledge with free interactive questions on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

Impact of Sub-Shell Structure on Ionisation Energy

The impact of the sub-shell structure is enough to sometimes outweigh and contrast general trends in ionisation energy.

Example of sub-shell impact

Example of sub-shell impact

  • An example of the impact of the sub-shell structure is the difference in ionisation energies between magnesium and aluminium within Period 3.
    • They are in the same period and so we would expect aluminium's ionisation energy to be greater due to a greater nuclear charge.
Contrast to the trend

Contrast to the trend

  • But the ionisation energies are:
    • Mg = 738 kJ/mol.
    • Al = 578 kJ/mol.
  • These values do not align with the general trend we predicted.
    • We need to look at the sub-shell structure of these atoms to understand what is going on.
Mg vs Al sub-shell structure

Mg vs Al sub-shell structure

  • Mg = 1s22s22p63s2
    • So the first ionisation removes an electron from the 3s orbital.
  • Al = 1s22s22p63s23p1
    • So the first ionisation removes an electron from the 3p orbital.
Sub-shell energies

Sub-shell energies

  • The 3p orbital is further from the nucleus on average than the 3s orbital.
    • So this orbital has a higher energy and its electrons have a lower electrostatic attraction to the positive nucleus.
    • It is also slightly shielded by the 3s2 electrons.
  • So it's easier to ionise an electron in the 3p orbital than in the 3s orbital.
    • This explains why it is easier to ionise Al than Mg.
    • This effect outweighs the general trend we looked at first.
Evidence

Evidence

  • From these arguments, we can use the relative first ionisation energy values of Mg and Al as evidence for sub-shell structures.

Impact of Electron Repulsion on Ionisation Energy

The impact of electron repulsion can be seen in the ionisation energies of Group 5 and Group 6.

Phosphorus and sulfur

Phosphorus and sulfur

  • Both P and S have their outer electron in a 3p orbital.
    • P = 1s22s22p63s23p3
    • S = 1s22s22p63s23p4
  • The shielding for each atom's outer electron is identical.
    • S has a higher nuclear charge and so you might expect S to have a higher ionisation energy. This is NOT the case.
Singly vs doubly occupied orbitals

Singly vs doubly occupied orbitals

  • The P electron is removed from a singly occupied orbital but the S electron is removed from a doubly occupied orbital.
    • S has a lower ionisation energy because electrons in the same orbital repel each other.
    • This means that an electron is easier to remove from a doubly occupied orbital.
  • This gives more evidence for the electronic structure model we are using.
Jump to other topics
1

Physical Chemistry

1.1

Atoms, Molecules & Stoichiometry

1.2

Atomic Structure

1.3

Chemical Bonding

1.4

States of Matter

1.5

Chemical Energetics

1.6

Electrochemistry

1.7

Equilibria

1.8

Partition Coefficient

1.9

Reaction Kinetics

2

Inorganic Chemistry

3

Organic Chemistry & Analysis

3.1

Introduction to Organic Chemistry

3.2

Hydrocarbons

3.3

Halogen Derivatives

3.4

Hydroxy Compounds

3.5

Carbonyl Compounds

3.6

Carboxylic Acids & Derivatives

3.7

Nitrogen Compounds

3.8

Polymerisation

3.9

Analytical Techniques

3.10

Organic Synthesis

Practice questions on Specific Impacts on Ionisation Energies

Can you answer these? Test yourself with free interactive practice on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
Answer all questions on Specific Impacts on Ionisation Energies

Unlock your full potential with Seneca Premium

  • Unlimited access to 10,000+ open-ended exam questions

  • Mini-mock exams based on your study history

  • Unlock 800+ premium courses & e-books

Get started with Seneca Premium