7.1.2

18th Century Commentary on Hamlet

Test yourself

18th-Century Responses to Hamlet

18th-century commentators recognised the power of Shakespeare’s play but were also not afraid to criticise aspects of the play and its hero.

Illustrative background for Hammer on Hamlet's characterIllustrative background for Hammer on Hamlet's character ?? "content

Hammer on Hamlet's character

  • Thomas Hammer published the first critical study of play in 1736.
    • Hammer complained about certain aspects of Hamlet’s behaviour in the play, in particular what he considered to be Hamlet’s cruelty in not killing Claudius when at prayer because he wants to send him to Hell.
    • For Hammer, such an attitude was un-Christian and such behaviour was unworthy of a hero.
Illustrative background for Hammer on Hamlet's delayIllustrative background for Hammer on Hamlet's delay ?? "content

Hammer on Hamlet's delay

  • Hammer raises the issue of Hamlet’s delay but does not make it a point of controversy or debate.
  • He simply makes the point that, had Hamlet killed Claudius sooner, “there would have been an End of our Play”.
  • For Hammer, Hamlet’s delay was a necessary plot device rather than a problem.
Illustrative background for Johnson on Hamlet's behaviourIllustrative background for Johnson on Hamlet's behaviour ?? "content

Johnson on Hamlet's behaviour

  • Dr Samuel Johnson is perhaps the leading literary figure of the age.
  • He was also critical of Hamlet’s behaviour, complaining that he “treats Ophelia with so much rudeness… useless and wanton cruelty”.
  • Again, the complaint is rooted in the idea that, in behaving like this, Hamlet’s stature as a tragic hero is diminished.
Illustrative background for Johnson on Hamlet's delayIllustrative background for Johnson on Hamlet's delay ?? "content

Johnson on Hamlet's delay

  • Johnson touches on the problem of Hamlet’s delay and criticises Hamlet for his passivity.
  • For Johnson, Hamlet is “an instrument” rather than “an agent”. This means that, rather than actively pursuing revenge, he allows himself to be swayed by circumstance.
  • Hamlet “makes no attempt to punish” Claudius and ultimately “has no part” in planning the fencing match which will lead to Claudius’ death.
Illustrative background for Johnson on Shakespeare's plotIllustrative background for Johnson on Shakespeare's plot ?? "content

Johnson on Shakespeare's plot

  • Johnson also criticised aspects of Shakespeare’s plotting.
  • He could find “no adequate cause” for Hamlet’s pretend madness “for he does nothing which he might not have done with the reputation of sanity”.

Jump to other topics

1Introduction

2Plot Summary

3Character Profiles

4Key Themes

5Writing Techniques

6Context

7Critical Debates

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson