7.1.2

18th Century Commentary on Hamlet

Test yourself on 18th Century Commentary on Hamlet

Test your knowledge with free interactive questions on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

18th-Century Responses to Hamlet

18th-century commentators recognised the power of Shakespeare’s play but were also not afraid to criticise aspects of the play and its hero.

Hammer on Hamlet's character

Hammer on Hamlet's character

  • Thomas Hammer published the first critical study of play in 1736.
    • Hammer complained about certain aspects of Hamlet’s behaviour in the play, in particular what he considered to be Hamlet’s cruelty in not killing Claudius when at prayer because he wants to send him to Hell.
    • For Hammer, such an attitude was un-Christian and such behaviour was unworthy of a hero.
Hammer on Hamlet's delay

Hammer on Hamlet's delay

  • Hammer raises the issue of Hamlet’s delay but does not make it a point of controversy or debate.
  • He simply makes the point that, had Hamlet killed Claudius sooner, “there would have been an End of our Play”.
  • For Hammer, Hamlet’s delay was a necessary plot device rather than a problem.
Johnson on Hamlet's behaviour

Johnson on Hamlet's behaviour

  • Dr Samuel Johnson is perhaps the leading literary figure of the age.
  • He was also critical of Hamlet’s behaviour, complaining that he “treats Ophelia with so much rudeness… useless and wanton cruelty”.
  • Again, the complaint is rooted in the idea that, in behaving like this, Hamlet’s stature as a tragic hero is diminished.
Johnson on Hamlet's delay

Johnson on Hamlet's delay

  • Johnson touches on the problem of Hamlet’s delay and criticises Hamlet for his passivity.
  • For Johnson, Hamlet is “an instrument” rather than “an agent”. This means that, rather than actively pursuing revenge, he allows himself to be swayed by circumstance.
  • Hamlet “makes no attempt to punish” Claudius and ultimately “has no part” in planning the fencing match which will lead to Claudius’ death.
Johnson on Shakespeare's plot

Johnson on Shakespeare's plot

  • Johnson also criticised aspects of Shakespeare’s plotting.
  • He could find “no adequate cause” for Hamlet’s pretend madness “for he does nothing which he might not have done with the reputation of sanity”.
Jump to other topics
1

Introduction

2

Plot Summary

3

Character Profiles

4

Key Themes

5

Writing Techniques

6

Context

7

Critical Debates

Practice questions on 18th Century Commentary on Hamlet

Can you answer these? Test yourself with free interactive practice on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
Answer all questions on 18th Century Commentary on Hamlet

Unlock your full potential with Seneca Premium

  • Unlimited access to 10,000+ open-ended exam questions

  • Mini-mock exams based on your study history

  • Unlock 800+ premium courses & e-books

Get started with Seneca Premium