2.3.3

Debates Over Trade

Test yourself

Debates Over Trade Within the Empire

The strengths of trade were an issue of debate amongst contemporaries.

Illustrative background for Imperial preferenceIllustrative background for Imperial preference ?? "content

Imperial preference

  • Joseph Chamberlain wanted closer economic ties between Britain and the Empire.
    • He thought imperial preference (reciprocal trade agreements and tariffs) would be better for Britain as it would encourage countries in the Empire to buy from Britain, instead of from Germany or the United States.
Illustrative background for Free trade vs protectionismIllustrative background for Free trade vs protectionism ?? "content

Free trade vs protectionism

  • The Liberal Party won the election in 1906 under the leadership of Sir Henry Campbell-Bannerman.
  • They pursued a policy of free trade in contrast to Chamberlain's proposal of protectionism.
  • O'Rourke (2000) highlights that between 1885 and 1889, the average tariff in the UK was 6.1% vs 29.9% in the USA. So even though there was protectionism within the Empire, Britain was actually far more open to international competition than other countries. Lehman & O'Rourke (2011) find a positive correlation between tariffs and economic growth in the early stages of economic development.
Illustrative background for Policies in coloniesIllustrative background for Policies in colonies ?? "content

Policies in colonies

  • Pre-war, Harley (2004) claims that "Britain lost its dominance as the workshop of the world".
  • By the outbreak of war, Australia, New Zealand, and South Africa had all imposed import tariffs to support their domestic industries and businesses.
  • In India, the swadeshi (self-sufficiency) movement emerged after the partition of Bengal. The swadeshi movement encouraged buying only goods produced locally in India, instead of goods produced by foreign countries or companies.

The Economic Impact British Rule in India

The historian Shashi Tharoor has prompted a re-write of British rule in India, advancing the argument that British rule was intensely damaging, destroying pre-existing industry and prestige.

Illustrative background for Shashi Tharoor, _An Era of Darkness_ (2016)Illustrative background for Shashi Tharoor, _An Era of Darkness_ (2016) ?? "content

Shashi Tharoor, An Era of Darkness (2016)

  • In this book, Tharoor argues that imperial rule was damaging for the Indian economy. He says that 'Indians paid, in other words, for the privilege of being conquered by the British.'
Illustrative background for Shashi Tharoor, _An Era of Darkness_ (2016)Illustrative background for Shashi Tharoor, _An Era of Darkness_ (2016) ?? "content

Shashi Tharoor, An Era of Darkness (2016)

  • Tharoor (2016) argues that 'at the beginning of the eighteenth century, as the British economic historian Angus Maddison has demonstrated, India’s share of the world economy was 23 per cent, as large as all of Europe put together. (It had been 27 per cent in 1700, when the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb’s treasury raked in £100 million in tax revenues alone.)'
  • 'By the time the British departed India, it had dropped to just over 3 per cent.'

Jump to other topics

1High Water Mark of the British Empire, 1857-1914

2Imperial Consolidation & Liberal Rule, 1890-1914

3Imperialism Challenged, 1914-1967

4The Wind of Change, 1947-1967

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson