1.2.8

Political Stability

Test yourself

President Hindenburg

Hindenburg was the president of Germany from 1925 to 1934.

Illustrative background for Hindenburg's electionIllustrative background for Hindenburg's election ?? "content

Hindenburg's election

  • Friedrich Ebert died in 1925. Presidents were directly elected, but the first round of votes was inconclusive.
  • Right wing political parties regrouped and supported a new candidate, general Paul von Hindenburg.
  • Rather than unite with other left-wing parties, the communists put up their own candidate, Thaelman, who got 6% of the vote. Hindenburg won by 3%.
Illustrative background for Hindenburg's political viewsIllustrative background for Hindenburg's political views ?? "content

Hindenburg's political views

  • Hindenburg was a monarchist, not a Republican, and was not committed to democracy. He attracted political groups who wanted an authoritarian system.
Illustrative background for Hindenburg's use of article 48Illustrative background for Hindenburg's use of article 48 ?? "content

Hindenburg's use of article 48

  • Hindenburg himself however, took his oath to uphold the Constitution seriously and did nothing unconstitutional. He used article 48, but so did Ebert.
  • Hindenburg only intervened over the expropriation of princes’ land. He said calls for a referendum on the issue unconstitutional. Chancellor Luther agreed.

Elections and attitudes to the Weimar Republic

Despite the decline in political violence, politics in the Weimar Republic was still unstable. This is demonstrated by the volatility in elections and the number of coalition governments.

Illustrative background for National elections 1924-1933Illustrative background for National elections 1924-1933 ?? "content

National elections 1924-1933

  • There were elections in May 1924, December 1924, May 1928, September 1930, July 1932, November 1932 and March 1933.
  • In the second half of the 1920s was a growth in support of pro-Weimar Republic parties. In May 1928 72.8% of votes were for pro-Weimar parties.
  • The DNVP became pro-Weimar in the late 1920s.
  • Between May 1924 and March 1933 there were 10 new coalition governments.
Illustrative background for Attitudes of the eliteIllustrative background for Attitudes of the elite ?? "content

Attitudes of the elite

  • Peukert (1993) argues that there was a decline in the liberalism in the late 1920s. The DDP lost ground. So too however, did anti-Weimar parties.
  • The elites continued to resent Weimar. Industrialists resented the cost of the welfare state, landed aristocracy, especially the Junkers, resented it’s loss of influence.
  • The army remained run by generals who desired a more authoritarian government. Many judges and civil servants looked back wistfully to imperial Germany.

Opinion formers

  • Bookbinder (1996) sees a lack of support for the Weimar Republic among opinion formers, such as teachers, newspaper editors and the clergy.
  • Bookbinder says that the late 1920s was when ‘real progress towards the creation of the Republicans could have been made’ as extremists had lost their popularity.
  • Bookbinder blames a lack of inspiration from political leaders and insufficient encouragement for democracy among opinion formers such as teachers.
Illustrative background for Attitudes of the middle classIllustrative background for Attitudes of the middle class ?? "content

Attitudes of the middle class

  • Smaller industrialists and businessmen, tended to be socially conservative. So were many middle-class professionals such as doctors teachers and lawyers.
  • Middle-class professionals did not benefit from rising real wages in industry. Nor did they benefit from the welfare state. They often felt left behind by the Republic.
Illustrative background for Attitudes of the working classIllustrative background for Attitudes of the working class ?? "content

Attitudes of the working class

  • About 40% of the electorate were working class, both urban proletariat and agricultural labourers.
  • The urban proletariat was often organised into trade unions that would fight for their interests. They tended to vote SPD or KPD.
  • Agricultural labourers did not tend to vote SPD or KPD.
  • Other voters voted according to their faith, or possibly for a regional or narrow interest party.

The Extent of Political Stability

Despite the term 'golden age', we should be sceptical of the political stability in the Weimar Republic.

Illustrative background for A stable democracyIllustrative background for A stable democracy ?? "content

A stable democracy

  • There was considerably less violence and insurrections between 1924 and 1929 in comparison to 1919 to 1923.
  • There was growing support for moderate parties, as shown in the electoral statistics for parties such as the SPD.
  • There was a decline in political extremism, as shown in the need for parties such as the DNVP changing their political strategy.
Illustrative background for An unstable democracyIllustrative background for An unstable democracy ?? "content

An unstable democracy

  • Coalitions were frequent because politicians were constantly bargaining to stay in power, thus discrediting parliamentary government.
  • There was a disconnect between voters and representatives in the Reichstag. Voters voted for a party list, the party decided who would represent them.
  • There was a growth of small, narrow, sectional interested parties. Only 60,000 votes were needed for a political party to get a deputy into the Reichstag.

Jump to other topics

1The Weimar Republic 1918-1933

2Nazi Germany 1933-1945

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson