1.1.3

Peace Settlement

Test yourself

Expectations and Reality of the Paris Peace Conference

Germany's expectations, and the reality of, the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 were very different. Germany did not have a voice at the conference.

Illustrative background for Expectations of the Paris Peace ConferenceIllustrative background for Expectations of the Paris Peace Conference ?? "content

Expectations of the Paris Peace Conference

  • Germany had expected to negotiate a peace based on Woodrow Wilson’s 14 Points.
  • Wilson’s key ideas were: self-determination; free trade; a general reduction in armaments; and a new international body, the League of Nations, to settle disputes; and ensure peace through collective security.
  • Hite and Hinton (2000):
    • ‘Germany hoped the Fourteen Points … would lead to a fair peace: they were in for a major shock.’
Illustrative background for The 'Big Four' Illustrative background for The 'Big Four'  ?? "content

The 'Big Four'

  • The 'Big Four' (Britain, France, Italy, USA) met in January 1919. France, Britain and Italy carried most weight because they had been damaged most, especially France.
  • France had been attacked by Germany twice (1871 and 1914) and wanted it permanently weakened to ensure French national security.
Illustrative background for November CriminalsIllustrative background for November Criminals ?? "content

November Criminals

  • The German delegates arrived in Paris in April expecting to negotiate, but found they had observer status only.
  • By April 1919, Germany’s army had been demobilised. Britain’s navy was still blockading its ports while French and Belgian troops were poised on its border.
  • In May 1919, Germany was presented with a list of non-negotiable demands.
  • The new German government signed The Treaty of Versailles. German opinion called it a Diktat and branded those who signed it as ‘November Criminals.’

Terms and Problems at the Paris Peace Conference, 1919

The main aspects of the Treaty of Versailles were territorial issues, demilitarisation, reparations and war guilt.

Illustrative background for Territorial issues for GermanyIllustrative background for Territorial issues for Germany ?? "content

Territorial issues for Germany

  • Alsace-Lorraine was returned to France.
  • Eupen and Malmedy to Belgium.
  • The coal-rich Saarland was given to France for 15 years. There would then be a plebiscite to determine its future.
  • Poland got Poznań and West Prussia, separating East Prussia from Germany. The port of Danzig became a ‘free city’ under League of Nations control.
  • Czechoslovakia was given the Sudetenland.
  • Control of Germany’s overseas colonies was given mainly to Britain and France.
  • Anschluss (unification) with Austria was forbidden.
Illustrative background for DemilitarisationIllustrative background for Demilitarisation ?? "content

Demilitarisation

  • Germany’s army was cut to 100,000 troops and conscription was banned.
  • There were to be no tanks, military aircraft, submarines or vessels over 10,000 tons.
  • The Rhineland was demilitarised. Allied troops occupied its west bank and would stay there for 15 years.
Illustrative background for The War Guilt ClauseIllustrative background for The War Guilt Clause ?? "content

The War Guilt Clause

  • Article 231 – the ‘War Guilt Clause’ – made Germany accept responsibility for starting the war and so all the losses that resulted.
  • Article 231 led to Germany paying reparations. A commission decided the amount. These were set in April 1921 at £6.6 billion (132 billion gold marks).

Attitudes to the Treaty of Versailles

Countries wanted to treat Germany with differing degrees of severity. This was largely driven by how World War One had impacted them.

Illustrative background for Impact of World War OneIllustrative background for Impact of World War One ?? "content

Impact of World War One

  • Dead: 1.3 million in France; one million in Britain; two million in Germany
    • The war dead left widows and orphans to be cared for.
  • Wounded: four million in France; two million in Britain; 6.3 million in Germany.
  • In France, 300,000 buildings and 21,000 square km of farmland was destroyed. The war was not fought on British or German soil, so such damage was small.
  • Belgium’s economic losses were so large that it needed a hefty loan from the Allies to repair the damage done to its economy and infrastructure.
Illustrative background for Would Germany have been less harsh?Illustrative background for Would Germany have been less harsh? ?? "content

Would Germany have been less harsh?

  • Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg issued a memo on 9 September 1914 that detailed the annexation of French and Belgian territory to Germany as a war aim.
  • The Bethmann-Hollweg memo also said that Germany was aiming for: ‘A commercial treaty that makes France economically dependent on Germany'.
  • The Brest-Litovsk Treaty of March 1918 required Russia to give up almost half its European territory.
    • Cavnedish (2008): ‘[The terms] were very harsh'.
Illustrative background for French attitudesIllustrative background for French attitudes ?? "content

French attitudes

  • 1914 was the second time in living memory that Germany had invaded France.
  • France wanted both compensation for what had happened and to make sure that it would not happen again. So Germany needed to be weakened.
  • Barros (2006):
    • ‘French definition of disarmament, “moral disarmament” … required convincing controls over German's material capability for war.’
  • Reaction to Versailles:
    • ‘People approved of the reparations ... However, there was a strong sense that Germany still threatened France.’
Illustrative background for British attitudesIllustrative background for British attitudes ?? "content

British attitudes

  • Lloyd-George did not want too harsh a treaty on Germany because it was an important trading partner for Britain.
  • But the public mood was very anti-German. ‘Hang the Kaiser’ and ‘Make Germany Pay’ were popular slogans.
  • Lloyd-George was facing re-re-election in the UK in December and had to pay heed to popular opinion.
Illustrative background for Impact of Versailles on GermanyIllustrative background for Impact of Versailles on Germany ?? "content

Impact of Versailles on Germany

  • Versailles damaged national pride and reduced the size of Germany and its army. The war guilt clause and reparations bill were deeply resented.
  • Although you could argue that Treaty damaged Germany economically, it was a source of anger and propaganda for German nationalists.
  • 7 million Germans found themselves living as minorities in other countries.
  • The new Weimar Republic was associated with signing it, as well as being blamed for the defeat by the army’s stab-in-the-back myth.
Illustrative background for Assessment of VersaillesIllustrative background for Assessment of Versailles ?? "content

Assessment of Versailles

  • Preuss (1923):
    • ‘The criminal madness of the Versailles Diktat was a shameless blow … The [Republic] constitution was born with this curse upon it'.
  • Troeltsch (1919):
    • ‘This … peace was possible because of the formal German declaration of war and its invasion of Belgium, thus making Germany exclusively responsible…’
  • More recently, historians such as Hiden (1974) have concluded that the ultimate failure of the Weimar Republic cannot be blamed on Versailles.

Jump to other topics

1The Weimar Republic 1918-1933

2Nazi Germany 1933-1945

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson