1.2.4

Government in Wartime

Test yourself

The Structure of Government During WW2

As in peacetime, the wartime government lacked structure. The Nazi government’s chaos hindered the country’s war efforts.

Illustrative background for Lack of clarityIllustrative background for Lack of clarity ?? "content

Lack of clarity

  • The lack of any clear structure made the government ineffective.
  • There was no clear decision-making process. As such, it was difficult to hold individuals to account.
Illustrative background for The war’s impact on the government’s structuresIllustrative background for The war’s impact on the government’s structures ?? "content

The war’s impact on the government’s structures

  • WW2 exacerbated the government’s existing anarchy.
  • The demands of the war economy meant new organisations needed to be created.
    • E.g. Organisation Todt (a civil engineering and military engineering organisation).
  • This led to greater complexity and overlap, meaning greater obscurity for the government.
Illustrative background for The rise of factionalismIllustrative background for The rise of factionalism ?? "content

The rise of factionalism

  • A faction is a small interest group which dissents against the larger group it is within.
  • Different factions developed within the Nazi government.
    • E.g. ministries, the Nazi Party itself, the army.
  • These factions dissented in their bid to gain power.

Hitler’s Involvement in Wartime Government

Hitler took a personal interest in the government’s military decisions. However, Hitler lacked military expertise and his decisions were not always beneficial for the war effort.

Illustrative background for Hitler’s authorityIllustrative background for Hitler’s authority ?? "content

Hitler’s authority

  • Hitler was determined to personally command the German war effort.
  • Over the course of the war, Hitler gave himself greater authority.
    • In 1941, he became commander-in-chief of the German army.
  • Hitler wanted to become the generalissimo leading the German war effort.
Illustrative background for Distrust of military advisorsIllustrative background for Distrust of military advisors ?? "content

Distrust of military advisors

  • Hitler did not trust many of his own leading military experts.
Illustrative background for Hitler's expertiseIllustrative background for Hitler's expertise ?? "content

Hitler's expertise

  • Hitler lacked military expertise. Following the war, leading military men claimed that Hitler’s interference prevented them from getting on with the war.
  • Largely, Hitler relied on his instinct (which could be very inaccurate).
Illustrative background for Hitler’s decision makingIllustrative background for Hitler’s decision making ?? "content

Hitler’s decision making

  • Initially, Hitler did make some sound decisions.
    • E.g. he drove the campaign plan which the German army used to invade France in 1940.
  • Hitler wanted to be directly involved in almost every decision. This approach was overbearing and arguably hindered the war effort rather than helped it.
  • Hitler also delayed difficult decisions.
    • E.g. He delayed an attack on Kursk in 1943 by months. This delay gave the Soviet Union more time to prepare.
Illustrative background for Weakness of Hitler’s military advisorsIllustrative background for Weakness of Hitler’s military advisors ?? "content

Weakness of Hitler’s military advisors

  • Historians have argued that they lacked strategic brilliance and were partly responsible for Germany’s defeat.
    • E.g. Hitler trusted Goering in the Battle of Britain. However, Goering’s decision making was flawed.
Illustrative background for Hitler’s retreat from the public eyeIllustrative background for Hitler’s retreat from the public eye ?? "content

Hitler’s retreat from the public eye

  • Following the invasion of the Soviet Union, Germany achieved few victories.
  • This led to a fall in morale on the home front.
  • From 1943, Hitler withdrew from the public eye.
  • Instead, Goebbels assumed a much more prominent position.
    • E.g. it was Goebbels, not Hitler, who gave a speech after Germany’s defeat at Stalingrad and called for the people to support ‘total war’.

The Role of the SS During the War

The SS was in charge of Nazi occupied territories during the war.

Illustrative background for SS control in occupied territoriesIllustrative background for SS control in occupied territories ?? "content

SS control in occupied territories

  • The SS was given licence to act how they pleased.
  • The SS ran territories the Nazis had conquered in Europe.
  • They operated exploitative policies.
Illustrative background for Executing racial policiesIllustrative background for Executing racial policies ?? "content

Executing racial policies

  • In 1944, 900,000 people were in the Waffen SS (the SS’s army organisation).
  • The Waffen SS were in charge of racial policies.
  • There was mass killings of Jews (e.g. 90% of Polish Jews were killed).
  • The Waffen SS also established ghettos and death camps (e.g. Auschwitz-Birkenau).

Jump to other topics

1Political & Governmental Change, 1918-1989

2Opposition, Control & Consent 1918-1989

3Economic Developments & Policies, 1918-1989

4Aspects of Life, 1918-1989

5Historical Interpretations

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson