1.1.6

The Collapse of Democracy 2

Test yourself

1932 Elections

Following the turmoil of Papen's government, elections were held. This demonstrated the rising support for extremist groups, particularly the Nazi party.

Illustrative background for Election in July 1932Illustrative background for Election in July 1932 ?? "content

Election in July 1932

  • The Nazis and Communists, both dedicated to overthrow of the Weimar regime, won over half the seats.
  • With 37% of the vote, the Nazis were the biggest party.
  • In August 1932 Hitler demanded to be made Chancellor with an Enabling Act enabling him to issue decrees himself.
  • Hindenburg disliked Hitler, not least because of his humble background, and refused.
  • Papen tried to build support in the Reichstag but was unable to.
Illustrative background for Reaction to the July electionIllustrative background for Reaction to the July election ?? "content

Reaction to the July election

  • In September 1932 the Reichstag declared no-confidence in Papen by 512 votes to 42. The DNVP and DVP backed him. Hindenburg dissolved the Reichstag.
  • Papen and Hindenburg did not want to call another election, but this would be unconstitutional. Schleicher warned it might cause civil war.
Illustrative background for Election in November 1932Illustrative background for Election in November 1932 ?? "content

Election in November 1932

  • The Nazis lost two million votes, their share was 33.1%, by far the largest party in the Reichstag. The KPD share went up to 16.9%.
  • Together these anti-Weimar parties controlled half the Reichstag. Political deadlock remained. The élite asked for Hitler to be Chancellor.
Illustrative background for Reaction to the November electionIllustrative background for Reaction to the November election ?? "content

Reaction to the November election

  • Hindenburg demanded Hitler must control a majority in the Reichstag first. Hitler would not agree to a coalition, as it would require compromise.
  • Papen’s proposal was to remain Chancellor, get rid of the Reichstag, use the army to suppress opposition and write a new authoritarian constitution.
  • Schleicher again warned of civil war.
  • His aim was to bring right and left wing together to support constitutional change.

Schleicher and Papen's Plan

Although Schliecher became chancellor it was apparent that his government was weak. Papen developed a plan where Hitler would become chancellor. He thought he could control him like a puppet-master.

Illustrative background for Schleicher becoming chancellorIllustrative background for Schleicher becoming chancellor ?? "content

Schleicher becoming chancellor

  • In December 1932, Schleicher persuaded Hindenburg to make him Chancellor.
  • The left wing Nazi Gregor Strasser was Vice Chancellor. Schleicher developed Brüning’s land reforms.
  • Schleicher’s plan failed. It alienated the Junkers and failed to win the support of the socialist section of the Nazi Party. Papen made his move against Schleicher.
Illustrative background for Papen's planIllustrative background for Papen's plan ?? "content

Papen's plan

  • Papen wanted to make Hitler Chancellor with him as his vice.
  • Papen believed Hitler could be controlled.
  • Otto Meissner:
    • Papen won Hindenburg over with ‘misgivings that… a revolt of the national socialists and civil war were likely if Hitler were not appointed.’
  • Kershaw (1991)
    • ‘Hitler needed the elite to attain power. But by January 1933, they in turn needed Hitler…’
  • On 16 January 1933 Hitler became Chancellor.
Illustrative background for Historical assessmentIllustrative background for Historical assessment ?? "content

Historical assessment

  • The historian Salmon argues that ‘Nazism came to power as a result of a miscalculation by conservative politicians and the military after a large number, [not] a majority, of the electorate had put it in a position to contend for power.’
  • Historian Laffen argues that ‘… the National Socialists came to power more because of their enemies' weaknesses and failures than because of their own strength.’
  • The historian Harman argues that ‘the generals and industrialists estimated…that ruling with [the Nazis who] would destroy the working-class organisations was preferable’

Jump to other topics

1Political & Governmental Change, 1918-1989

2Opposition, Control & Consent 1918-1989

3Economic Developments & Policies, 1918-1989

4Aspects of Life, 1918-1989

5Historical Interpretations

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson