5.3.1

Conflict with Parliament

Test yourself

Elizabeth I and her Parliament

Parliament's power increased over the 16th century. A historical debate has developed over whether conflict between Crown and parliament increased during Elizabeth’s reign.

Illustrative background for Neale’s ‘Puritan Choir’ ThesisIllustrative background for Neale’s ‘Puritan Choir’ Thesis ?? "content

Neale’s ‘Puritan Choir’ Thesis

  • A historian called Neale developed a thesis on the role of Parliament:
    • Parliament’s increasing importance, especially in religious matters, increasingly encouraged factionalism and opposition to royal authority in the Commons.
    • A group of Puritans (the ‘Puritan Choir’) demanded more Protestant reforms for the Church of England.
    • The Puritan Choir is evidence of a more organised Commons that was prepared to contest Elizabeth’s policies.
Illustrative background for Evidence to support Neale's thesisIllustrative background for Evidence to support Neale's thesis ?? "content

Evidence to support Neale's thesis

  • The Commons angered Elizabeth I by discussing the succession in 1566 and religious reform in 1593.
  • There were conflicts between the Commons and Queen over monopolies in 1601. The Queen granted the Common's demands.
  • Between 1563 and 1566, at least 40 MPs (working together) pressed for more strongly Protestant religious reform.
  • The Commons asserted their rights:
    • To have free speech in 1576 and 1593.
    • To settle an election dispute in a Norfolk constituency in 1586.
Illustrative background for Revisionist thesis Illustrative background for Revisionist thesis  ?? "content

Revisionist thesis

  • Historians such as Elton interpreted the Parliament differently to Neale. This different view is called revisionism.
  • There was more cooperation than conflict. Any opposition was infrequent, not organised, and never a serious challenge to Elizabeth I.
  • Any disagreements were usually working out policies, not actual conflicts.
  • There were only 13 parliaments, on average 10 weeks each, in a 45-year reign. The rest of the time Elizabeth ruled through the Privy Council and its machinery.
Illustrative background for Evidence to support the revisionist thesisIllustrative background for Evidence to support the revisionist thesis ?? "content

Evidence to support the revisionist thesis

  • Most of the time, the Commons gave Elizabeth what she wanted.
  • Elizabeth forbade both the Commons and the Privy Council from discussing her marriage and succession.
  • Parliament was effectively under the control of the Privy Council and nobility. At least a third of MPs were nominated by a noble patron, not elected.
  • The Commons conceded to the Lord Chancellor over the 1586 Norfolk election.
  • There was no general, concerted support for freedom of speech.

Parliament's Sitting in 1601

The main issue which MPs wanted to address in 1601 was the abuse of monopolies. This session was Elizabeth’s final parliament.

Illustrative background for Reasons for summoning ParliamentIllustrative background for Reasons for summoning Parliament ?? "content

Reasons for summoning Parliament

  • Elizabeth summoned parliament to replenish the Crown’s coffers. These had been exhausted by England’s campaigns in Ireland and Spain.
Illustrative background for Monopoly rightsIllustrative background for Monopoly rights ?? "content

Monopoly rights

  • Over the course of her reign, Elizabeth granted several monopoly rights. These were highly lucrative.
  • Elizabeth granted these rights to merchants or nobles who, in exchange, gave favours to the crown.
  • Many MPs believed this was unfair as it raised the price of goods. They had raised the issue in 1571 and 1597. However, Elizabeth had not addressed the issue.
  • Parliament criticised the Crown and argued it was an abuse of her royal privilege.
Illustrative background for Elizabeth’s responseIllustrative background for Elizabeth’s response ?? "content

Elizabeth’s response

  • Elizabeth intervened in the issue to appease Parliament.
  • She invited 141 MPs to her palace. There, she delivered a flattering speech (now referred to as the ‘Golden Speech’).
  • Historians argue this demonstrates Elizabeth’s shrewdness.
  • Mervyn (2001): "She [Elizabeth] preserved her prerogative and subsidies by conceding to Parliament's demands."
  • Elizabeth agreed to abolish some of the monopoly patents.

Jump to other topics

1Monarch & Government

2Religious Changes

3State Control & Popular Resistance

4Economic, Social & Cultural Change

5Historical Interpretations

5.1Significance of Threats to National Security

5.2Court Politics

5.3Elizabeth & Parliament

5.4Social Distress in the 1590s

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson