6.1.2

Contemporary & Modern Reviews

Test yourself

Contemporary Reviews

When A Streetcar Named Desire was first performed on 3 December 1947, critics were unsure about its content.

Illustrative background for Positive receptionIllustrative background for Positive reception ?? "content

Positive reception

  • One critic offered the view that the play was "a quietly woven play of untangibles".
  • Another observed that Williams was "a genuinely poetic playwright whose knowledge of people is honest and thorough".
Illustrative background for Negative receptionIllustrative background for Negative reception ?? "content

Negative reception

  • One critic called it "unpleasant" and that Williams "has a pessimistic stance to human existence".
  • Williams might have combated this latter comment by saying that it was a realistic reflection of life – and that sometimes life is pessimistic.
Illustrative background for __"Flowery rhetoric"__Illustrative background for __"Flowery rhetoric"__ ?? "content

"Flowery rhetoric"

  • Although the play was successful, some contemporary commentators satirized Williams’ use of symbolism and his "flowery rhetoric".
Illustrative background for __"Shocking material"__Illustrative background for __"Shocking material"__ ?? "content

"Shocking material"

  • Others tried to pre-warn audiences about the "potentially shocking material" and also seemed to criticise the play’s "loose structure".
  • Such comments have to be put in the context of the time: homosexuality, rape and women’s sexuality were not normally topics seen in drama during this period.
  • As we know, Williams was progressive in his use of structure and form. This would have been very different from other dramas produced in the same period.
Illustrative background for Success Illustrative background for Success  ?? "content

Success

  • Despite these early observations the play was a commercial and critical success and has gone on to become one of the most analysed plays in American literature.

Modern Reviews

Here are two reviews of modern productions of A Streetcar Named Desire:

Illustrative background for 2018 _The Stage_ reviewIllustrative background for 2018 _The Stage_ review ?? "content

2018 The Stage review

  • A review in The Stage newspaper of a 2018 production in Southampton said the following about the play:
    • “Stanley knows what he’s doing from the off. Along with the way he manspreads across the stage, there's something sagacious in his eyes and skittish in his movements. Something sinister, too, in the way he slaps Stella’s behind. His violence is only barely beneath the surface – until it’s not.”
Illustrative background for _EdinburghGuide_ reviewIllustrative background for _EdinburghGuide_ review ?? "content

EdinburghGuide review

  • A review of a 2017 production at the King’s Theatre in Edinburgh in EdinburghGuide.com said that:
    • “A Streetcar Named Desire is unashamedly a product of its era, yet when race-blind casting gifts the production with two well-rounded performances, it also leaves offensive and racist comments unattended and uncontextualised. Animalistic comments made about Stanley by his caucasian sister-in-law take on new meanings that are never fully addressed.”

Jump to other topics

1Context & Overview

2Scene Summaries

3Character Profiles

4Key Ideas

5Writing Techniques

6Critical Debates

7Ideas About Tragedy

Go student ad image

Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring

  • Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home

  • Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs

  • 30+ school subjects covered

Book a free trial lesson