6.1.2
Contemporary & Modern Reviews
Contemporary Reviews
Contemporary Reviews
When A Streetcar Named Desire was first performed on 3 December 1947, critics were unsure about its content.
Positive reception
Positive reception
- One critic offered the view that the play was "a quietly woven play of untangibles".
- Another observed that Williams was "a genuinely poetic playwright whose knowledge of people is honest and thorough".
Negative reception
Negative reception
- One critic called it "unpleasant" and that Williams "has a pessimistic stance to human existence".
- Williams might have combated this latter comment by saying that it was a realistic reflection of life – and that sometimes life is pessimistic.
"Flowery rhetoric"
"Flowery rhetoric"
- Although the play was successful, some contemporary commentators satirized Williams’ use of symbolism and his "flowery rhetoric".
"Shocking material"
"Shocking material"
- Others tried to pre-warn audiences about the "potentially shocking material" and also seemed to criticise the play’s "loose structure".
- Such comments have to be put in the context of the time: homosexuality, rape and women’s sexuality were not normally topics seen in drama during this period.
- As we know, Williams was progressive in his use of structure and form. This would have been very different from other dramas produced in the same period.
Success
Success
- Despite these early observations the play was a commercial and critical success and has gone on to become one of the most analysed plays in American literature.
Modern Reviews
Modern Reviews
Here are two reviews of modern productions of A Streetcar Named Desire:
2018 The Stage review
2018 The Stage review
- A review in The Stage newspaper of a 2018 production in Southampton said the following about the play:
- “Stanley knows what he’s doing from the off. Along with the way he manspreads across the stage, there's something sagacious in his eyes and skittish in his movements. Something sinister, too, in the way he slaps Stella’s behind. His violence is only barely beneath the surface – until it’s not.”
EdinburghGuide review
EdinburghGuide review
- A review of a 2017 production at the King’s Theatre in Edinburgh in EdinburghGuide.com said that:
- “A Streetcar Named Desire is unashamedly a product of its era, yet when race-blind casting gifts the production with two well-rounded performances, it also leaves offensive and racist comments unattended and uncontextualised. Animalistic comments made about Stanley by his caucasian sister-in-law take on new meanings that are never fully addressed.”
1Context & Overview
1.1The Author
1.2Social Context & Setting
2Scene Summaries
2.3Scene Three
2.5Scene Five
2.6Scene Six
2.7Scene Seven
2.9Scene Nine
2.10Scene Ten
3Character Profiles
3.1Blanche DuBois & Stanley Kowalski
3.2Stella Kowalski & Harold Mitchell (Mitch)
4Key Ideas
4.1Sex & Gender
4.2Appearances, Fantasy & Reality
5Writing Techniques
5.2Genre, Form & Language
6Critical Debates
6.1Early & Modern Reception
6.2Feminist, Psychoanalytic & Marxist Approach
7Ideas About Tragedy
7.1Ideas About Tragedy
Jump to other topics
1Context & Overview
1.1The Author
1.2Social Context & Setting
2Scene Summaries
2.3Scene Three
2.5Scene Five
2.6Scene Six
2.7Scene Seven
2.9Scene Nine
2.10Scene Ten
3Character Profiles
3.1Blanche DuBois & Stanley Kowalski
3.2Stella Kowalski & Harold Mitchell (Mitch)
4Key Ideas
4.1Sex & Gender
4.2Appearances, Fantasy & Reality
5Writing Techniques
5.2Genre, Form & Language
6Critical Debates
6.1Early & Modern Reception
6.2Feminist, Psychoanalytic & Marxist Approach
7Ideas About Tragedy
7.1Ideas About Tragedy
Unlock your full potential with GoStudent tutoring
Affordable 1:1 tutoring from the comfort of your home
Tutors are matched to your specific learning needs
30+ school subjects covered