Application of Sexual Ethics

Religious Studies: OCR A Level, topic 2.9.3

Applying Ethical Theories to Sexual Ethics

Sexual ethics involves evaluating the morality of sexual behaviour using ethical theories.

Ethical theories

Ethical theories

  • Natural law, situation ethics, Kantian ethics, and utilitarianism offer different perspectives.
  • Each theory provides unique insights into issues like premarital and extramarital sex, and homosexuality.
  • Understanding these theories helps in analysing diverse sexual ethical dilemmas.
Natural law and sexual ethics

Natural law and sexual ethics

  • Thomas Aquinas developed natural law in the 13th century, focusing on purpose and order.
  • Natural law views sex as primarily for procreation within marriage, reflecting divine intention.
  • Natural law typically opposes premarital, extramarital sex, and homosexuality as contrary to natural purposes.
  • Adherents value acts that align with human nature and divine law.
Situation ethics and sexual ethics

Situation ethics and sexual ethics

  • Joseph Fletcher proposed situation ethics in the 1960s, prioritising love (agape) in decision-making.
  • Situation ethics considers context, emphasising love and the well-being of those involved.
  • Situation ethics may permit unconventional sexual relationships if motivated by genuine care and harm reduction.
  • This approach allows more personal judgement and flexibility in ethical decisions.
Kantian ethics and sexual ethics

Kantian ethics and sexual ethics

  • Immanuel Kant, in the 18th century, emphasised duty, reason, and universal moral laws.
  • Kantian ethics assesses sexual acts by their adherence to duty and respect for persons.
  • Kantian ethics views sexual relationships needing mutual consent and respect, avoiding objectification.
  • This theory may oppose acts driven solely by lust or personal gain as undermining autonomy.
Utilitarianism and sexual ethics

Utilitarianism and sexual ethics

  • Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill developed Utilitarianism, prioritising happiness maximisation.
  • Utilitarianism assesses sexual acts by their outcomes, promoting pleasure and reducing pain.
  • Utilitarianism supports acts enhancing overall well-being, potentially accepting diverse sexual behaviours.
  • Utilitarianism encourages evaluating long-term consequences and societal impact of actions.
Example: Ethical theories and cohabitation

Example: Ethical theories and cohabitation

  • Natural Law may oppose cohabitation without marriage, promoting traditional familial roles.
  • Situation Ethics might endorse cohabitation if it fosters a loving, supportive relationship.
  • Kantian ethics requires assessing if cohabitation respects individual dignity and mutual obligations.
  • Utilitarianism considers if cohabitation enhances happiness and minimises harm for the couple and wider society.

Test yourself on Application of Sexual Ethics

  • Which ethical theory prioritises love (agape) and context in decision-making regarding sexual ethics?

  • Which ethical theories evaluate sexual ethics by considering context or outcomes?

Practise this topic for free