Failures: Vilna (1920)
History: Cambridge International GCSE The Twentieth Century (Option B), topic 2.2.3
The Vilna Crisis (1920)
The League of Nations failed to resolve the Vilna dispute in 1920, exposing its weakness in keeping peace between Poland and Lithuania.

Background of the Vilna dispute
- The League of Nations faced the Vilna crisis in 1920 between Poland and Lithuania.
- Lithuania was a newly created country from the Treaty of Versailles.
- Vilna was the capital of the newly-established Lithuania.
- The conflict started after the Polish army took Vilna on 9 October 1920.
- Poland thought it had a claim to Vilna - it had a large Polish-speaking population.
- Lithuania claimed Vilna as its historical capital city.
- Poland occupied Vilna after World War I, ignoring Lithuania's protests.

League's role and response
- The League of Nations tried to mediate the Vilna conflict.
- The League called for a plebiscite (vote by the people in a country) to decide Vilna's status.
- The plebiscite did not happen because neither Poland nor Lithuania wanted to hold it in fear they would lose.
- The League lacked military power to enforce decisions.
- The League sent a commission, but Poland refused to cooperate fully.
- The commission’s aim was to investigate the problem and find a solution.

Reasons for the League's failure
- The League relied on member countries' cooperation, which Poland ignored.
- The League had no army to stop Poland's occupation.
- Neither Britain nor France wanted to send troops to enforce the League’s decision for their own economic and political reasons.
- The League had no means to impose sanctions effectively on Poland.

Consequences
- Lithuania lost control of Vilna due to weak League support.
- Poland solidified its hold on Vilna despite League protests.
- The Vilna crisis increased mistrust between the two nations.
- The League's failure made Lithuania lose faith in international peace efforts.

Impact
- The League's failure in Vilna showed limits in peacekeeping roles.
- The League appeared weak against aggressive member states.
- The Vilna crisis damaged the League's reputation globally.
- The League failed to prevent territorial disputes after WWI.

Lessons from Vilna
- The League needed stronger enforcement powers to keep peace.
- Member countries' support was essential for League success.
- The Vilna case showed the League's difficulty in resolving territorial conflicts.
- The League's failure highlighted the challenges of post-war diplomacy.
Test yourself on Failures: Vilna (1920)
What triggered the Vilna crisis in 1920?
Why was the League unable to enforce its decision in Vilna?