Test your knowledge with free interactive questions on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

General Language Use

The language in the play is realistic, reflecting the patterns of speech commonly used in early 21st Century Britain.

Formal vs colloquial

Formal vs colloquial

  • While professionals such as Siobhan and Mrs Gascoyne speak in a more formal manner, the other characters tend to use everyday, colloquial language to communicate with each other.
Taboo language/expletives

Taboo language/expletives

  • One of the most striking features in the play is the use of taboo language and expletives, most often used when adults are surprised or infuriated by Christopher’s behaviour.
  • These outbursts can often be very humorous, providing a moment of release for an audience (e.g. the Station Policeman’s exclamation of “Shitting fuck” once he realises the train is moving and he is on his way to London).
Taboo language (cont.)

Taboo language (cont.)

  • At other times, (e.g. Ed’s threatening “Don’t give me that bollocks you little shit” at the beginning of the fight scene) the effect can be shocking.

Christopher's Language

Christopher’s language is very distinctive. His language is heard in his dialogue, monologues and the passages from his notebook that Siobhan narrates.

Formal language

Formal language

  • Christopher's speech has a very formal tone.
  • Christopher avoids the contractions commonly used in spoken language – Christopher will say “I have” instead of “I’ve” and “I am” instead of “I’m”.
Avoids slang/taboo language

Avoids slang/taboo language

  • Christopher does not use slang or taboo language, unlike almost every other character in the play.
  • This may be because, unlike other characters in the play, Christopher expresses his fears and frustrations using non-verbal communications (e.g. rolling on the ground and groaning).
Avoids metaphors and idioms

Avoids metaphors and idioms

  • Christopher avoids using metaphorical or idiomatic language because it “confuses” him when words and phrases do not make literal sense.
  • In an early scene in Part One, Christopher lists expressions such as “He was the apple of her eye” and “We had a real pig of a day” which he feels have nothing to do with the meanings they have.
  • Likewise, Christopher avoids using humour, largely because humour often involves puns or a play on words which may not make literal sense.
Factual language

Factual language

  • Christopher’s language is very factual. He often communicates in long, compound sentences which list a number of facts together, separated by the conjunction “and”.
  • Again, the effect is to make his utterances sound strangely formal and lacking in emotion.
Jump to other topics
1

Introduction & Context

2

Form, Structure & Language

3

Text Summary & Analysis

4

Themes

5

Recap: Main Quotes

Practice questions on Language

Can you answer these? Test yourself with free interactive practice on Seneca — used by over 10 million students.

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
Answer all questions on Language

Unlock your full potential with Seneca Premium

  • Unlimited access to 10,000+ open-ended exam questions

  • Mini-mock exams based on your study history

  • Unlock 800+ premium courses & e-books

Get started with Seneca Premium